Message from @Seedle
Discord ID: 330682032520953868
dont crucify me
i will crucify you.
either way
thats ideological puritanism for you
It's not even puritanism
you're commenting on something you don't know about
Doesn't have to be for ideological reasons
Leaders don't equal state lmao
but I do know about it
that's against literally all theory
but sure
I can have a bad habit of crucifying ;P
you're just not agreeing
think that way
state
steɪt/Submit
noun
a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government.
"Germany, Italy, and other European states"
synonyms: country, nation, land, sovereign state, nation state, kingdom, empire, republic, confederation, federation, body politic, commonwealth, power, world power, superpower, polity, domain, territory; More
But yeah all ideologies are puritanism
>Dictionary
the dictionary doesnt agree with you so it must be purged
we'll make a new dictionary
a better one
It just literally goes against anarchist and marxist theory, which we're talking about here. I just mentioned an anarchist commune, which you deem a state
you've just colloqualized the term 'state' to mean a powerful cabal of bourgoise leaders
In human development, class society didn't arise until the advancement out of hunter-gatherer society.
No I didn't lmao?
How?
what were chiefs then
I said the state is an apparatus of the ruling class.
Because it is
Chiefs were generally after hunter-gatherers boi.
so hunter gatherers had no elders, no leaders of any kind
just like how wild bovine herds have no alpha males or leadership, theyre just a collective herd with no direction right?
Elders weren't always leaders, my dude
yes thatw as sarcasm
but they were though
it wasnt every man for himself
>no chiefs equals no leaders
wtf
early humans worked together
You keep strawmanning my point.
no I'm not
Like as if you CANT have a collective consensus on who's more qualified to make certain decisions