Message from @Seedle
Discord ID: 330682923114168320
just like how wild bovine herds have no alpha males or leadership, theyre just a collective herd with no direction right?
Elders weren't always leaders, my dude
yes thatw as sarcasm
but they were though
it wasnt every man for himself
>no chiefs equals no leaders
wtf
early humans worked together
You keep strawmanning my point.
no I'm not
Like as if you CANT have a collective consensus on who's more qualified to make certain decisions
which isn't a state, tard.
There always has to be a leader
and an identity or whatever the fuck
like what?
yes so a collective of people with leaders, thats what we call a state
Read early human history
you want a stateless state
I do read early human history
Again
What's your ideology?
thats not relevant
Yes it is.
Okay which class were in charge of this state? Exactly how'd this state use violence to keep the "proletariat" down?
I'm a Libertarian Communist.
Or slave owners
dont strawman my arguments by using personal attacks and ad hominems
adress what im saying
I am
judge me by the content of my character
It would be an ad hominem if I was simply denouncing your argument by personally attacking you.
I'm not though.
It's relevant because Seedle for example believes in the immediate destruction of the state (I assume) And I believe that when the proletariat has taken over the state and is done with it
it'll die out
Though I'm not too sure how ancom works
but if you remove the state and still have a leadership and a clear direction, a government essentially
Sorry libcom*
how do you not have a state
In which case I'm even more confused
In terms of a political entity, a state is any politically organized community living under a single system of government.[