Message from @Tristan-Jyrki
Discord ID: 330683737098420224
you want a stateless state
I do read early human history
Again
a strawman.
What's your ideology?
thats not relevant
Yes it is.
Okay which class were in charge of this state? Exactly how'd this state use violence to keep the "proletariat" down?
I'm a Libertarian Communist.
Or slave owners
dont strawman my arguments by using personal attacks and ad hominems
adress what im saying
I am
judge me by the content of my character
It would be an ad hominem if I was simply denouncing your argument by personally attacking you.
I'm not though.
It's relevant because Seedle for example believes in the immediate destruction of the state (I assume) And I believe that when the proletariat has taken over the state and is done with it
it'll die out
Though I'm not too sure how ancom works
but if you remove the state and still have a leadership and a clear direction, a government essentially
how do you not have a state
In which case I'm even more confused
In terms of a political entity, a state is any politically organized community living under a single system of government.[
>how do you not have a state
Because there's no class to enforce their will on you
Yeah a state needs to force violence upon a certain class
Semi-relevant and it'll open your eyes a bit on a historical materialist approach to history and class society.
does it have to though
without that it wont really function as a state
brb
this article refers to rome in 133BC as an empire even though it was still a republic at that point
and would remain on for almost 150 more years
0/10
the main downfall of rome was touched on in this article
that being the mass influx of slaves and collectivization of private property
with the original romans who built the empire becoming basically a minority in their own empire, rome was no longer roman
and quickly lost all of the values and ethos that built it to such great heights in the first place
thats why it became so directionless and decayed over time
what the fuck is this