Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 333010389191229442
can't make drastic change to welfare in a democratic state though
I read a lot about each european crisis but i cant remember too well atm
without civil war
that's fine
Democracy is shit
then civil war is the smaller price to pay
government is generally shit but it is necessary
democracy is the best way of containing government
democracy isnt shit its shit when you let everyone have a vote
Democracy is most representative of the people and is therefore the most stable form of government
aristocracy is a good idea
the people aren't stable @Tengri#2673
the masses are easily tampered with
I like Lee Kuan Yew's idea where people aged 40-65 with children should have 2 votes
Until the people get pissed and your country is torn apart in civil war
the plebs will vote themselves money nothing stable with that
Democracy has the least civil war
kind of an odd idea, might work
Roman republic had civil war constantly
The ballot paralyzes revolution
rhodesian voting laws were pretty good if you look at them
Roman Republic wasn't democratic
I know, but there were representatives from the lower class
It was extremely corrupt
Democracies allow people to feel like they're voting someone new in without realizing that person is owned by the same groups
It still worked
No it didn't
I guess it is a stable way though
just reduce government power and it will handle itself
Do you know how it died
Pissed off plebs who supported Caesar over the senators
Democracies today are extremely corrupt too
it died because stoics are fags
It's just legalized corruption
It died through authoritarianism and open borders
>stoics are fags
explain
lol
What
Open borders?
roman empire was fucked by migrants