Yes.

And all ways of life decay

That's what Dialectical Materialism says, too.

If communism occurred and was stable enough to last, it too would eventually find an end and be replaced

Now you're getting it.

Possibly even by the original slave kingdoms Marx talked about

Hence the revolution

In the future, there will be systems that wil come to exist that we cannot even think of.

Precisely

Socialism is supposed to transform into something else. Just like Feudalism transformed into Capitalism.

https://images.discordapp.net/attachments/323365339242954753/336383574112468992/9903f8a9c9c26050218ba3112e838afef6fbf55e6bf6cdfe19744e0eee7cd6e7.jpg

Yes, I agree 100%.

Feudalism more or less transformed into monarchism, which then turned into capitalism.

RIP fags

Though it is true, capitalism started under monarchism.

I am agreeing with you on this point. The fact that systems change is exactly why Marx predicts Socialism.

According to the relationship to production.

It is a social theory.

Yet with that logic, coulden't every system be temporary, considering they all change eventually?

It is a very specific prediction based on the material relationship people have to the means of production. There is a tension between the classes which is fundamental to material existence, and must come to ahead one way or another.

The only way this can be resolved is with socialism, which is why it is predicted in the future.

@Deleted User everything is temporary.

How could socialism be the only way?

Because it resolves the economic differences between classes.

Is just the next step in development.

Yet how can you say that there could not be another system that resolves economic differences?

There are other systems which have actually existed.

Yet hey were short lived.

It is really a practical question.

Socialism must go too.

My solution to the unreality of the utopia and the destruction of the nation: Self Contained Revolutionary State

The question on how we resolve economic tensions is fundamental. There is strong precedent in Lenin and the USSR, for now, but it is a developing reality.

@Deleted User Introspection and protectionism is political suicide.

@Deleted User Who said it had to be introspective and protectionist?

>self contained

If protectionism should exist, it should be temporary before moving to isolationism.

Self contained in my lingo means "tries not to spill out into a huge schism situation"

No, you idiots. You have to engage with the world and work with it or it will turn against you.

Unity is important.

But you need Authority to hold it.

True, but it is unlikely that unity will ever be universal throughout even the largest and most stable countries.