Message from @MrSally
Discord ID: 337120708830429186
tfw you miss the enigmatic Gaddafi, if just because he represents an older terror in the news than ISIS
It's not socialist because of his capitalist intentions.
No I am saying that practice is important. You have to walk the walk. Theory must meet practice otherwise it is unscientific. Gaddafi was all talk and thus useful to the imperialists.
If he was useful why did they kill him?
Gaddafi was a crazy scumbag and that's pretty much all there was to him during my lifetime.
They'd keep him in power like every other crackpot dictator such as Pinochet
Because his usefulness expired.
Than he wasn't useful
That's not a very good argument.
You're both imperialists
Eh?
Can you not tell the difference between useful now and not useful tomorrow?
That's not the point
Imperialists have their own games.
You know who made a new place after Gadaffi? Islamic militants. They have the new use to imperialist policy.
@Deleted User What's your point? that doesn't make Gaddafi an Imperialist puppet
No, no, his craziness and ease of provocation did that.
Imperialist
Don't project stuff.
I'm not, I'm calling out liberals for what they are
>There will never be another dictator who suggests we split Switzerland
>muh projectuion
You don't know me at all, man. I've said like, six things to you.
I can still tell you're an imperialist
THAT IS PROJECTING
>I'm a psychiatrist xD
Man, you're as bad as righties on Twitter.
Okay
Sorry I don't support the liberal west
Yeah, neiter do I, fuck face.
You clearly do
Sorry, just had to add some inflection there.
Fair enough
I'm sorry
No, it's okay.
I will end it here. I am saying that Gaddafi was allowed to exist, because the moment he wasn't useful he died. When you review the recent history of Libya it is clear that is did not have strong effect to turn others to Communism. To imperialist powers, Gaddafi was a lesser evil, because he was a basic dictator, with no effect on others, and only interested in his own land. On every level he was a very poor theoretician, because he did nothing to help the international working class. Yes, expectation is high, but because it has to be. History is a tough judge.
Isn't it less Orwellian to just say he was stupid and really easy to troll?
Yes but Dusseldorf would never understand that.