Message from @MrSally
Discord ID: 337140440786534411
The reactions to appearances are the first thing (and mostly the only thing) that ordinary stupid people think about.
That's literally the basis for your argument m8
Yes.
Yes, and a good theoretician would recognise this, but this is not the basis of theory, which is materialism. How dumb can you be?
People are stupid and judge distant events by looks alone.
Your entire argument is about appearances
Yes.
You're worried about how you're perceived
No.
In fact, my entire argument has been about making capitalists look bad.
>oh noez guys we don't want to appear to be mean to liberals or other reactionaries/bourgeois
>human perception is the basis of reality
Read Kant, you are wrong. The external world is not only what humans conceive of it.
Making capitalists look bad does not remove them from power
I know this, but in the scope of politics and economics, it is indeed.
Making capitalists look bad is how you democratically remove them.
You can't democratically remove them
They own the """""democratic""""" system
Prove it?
They own the deep state
Red pill
"deep state"
Take it
Jesus H.
You have a very dim very of humanity. Saying that whoever looks bad will lose. Well, understand this. The final vision you have before your death is someone cutting your neck and looks bad, but somehow he lives! Wow, badness is not a death sentence. Unlike ignorance and weakness.
They have control over the intelligence agencies
which bribe and threaten presidents
I don't even have to prove it because it's obvious
Yes you do though.
They control the CIA, NSA and FBI
I know.
But the president can fire everyone in every one of those agencies.
Is this proof enough? http://www.newsweek.com/cia-has-been-undermining-governments-years-531609
Bernie would have actually drained the swamp.
They literally funded pinochet
Thanks for the chat. This is over for me.
Good luck out there, bubba.
Cya Chopin
I had more fun talking to you than Sally
Yes, yes, I'm sure.