Ok, but declaring open war is different from patriotism

foiirugiohcnveruo;mo kt

Different but strong relationship.

A NatSoc state technically will only ever encompass it's own people anyway

Exactly

That's part of the antagonism.

so not unless there are millions of people from the same ethnicity living somewhere else

they won't declare war

They can't help themselves.

@Deleted User just look at Nazi germany, eventually at a certain point people would hate being fed the same nonsense, and rise up against the regime

These are big if's

I'm just showing you the patterns and examples we have from history.

@Deleted User Exactly

They all share these characteristics

@Deleted User they want to control people's personal lives?

Nazi Germany isn't representative of what every National Socialist state would look like

they were a special case

>not real fascism

Okay buddy

They were definitely real fascism

@Deleted User how about Fascist Italiano

and real national socialism

Call me when we have an example.

But the point i'm trying to make is

They had ethnic germans living in poland

and had former borders there

now that pushed them to war

whilst a country morelike say australia

wouldn't have the same outcome

or NZ

Or America @Deleted User

Yea exactly

The problem is ur trying to draw borders for certain ethnic groups

IT DOESNT MAKE SENSE LAGISTICALLY

It did for thousands of years

TO me this is stronger speculation than trying to understand it from living examples. It just not scientific otherwise.

The future is also not some infinite possibility, the cause and effect, the conditions of history also determine the future.

@Deleted User true

They were bound to fail anyway because it disrupted the balance of power in europe and thus Britain and France would've wanted to disable them regardless

it wasn't a direct response from their own ideology

You hit the nail on the head.