The ideology behind that argument is racism.

you instantly dismiss it on the basis of racism

The logic is racist logic.

Not actual logic.

you could argue it's positive to a racist platform

Not actual, rational logic.

but there is still definitely logic behind it

'rational logic'

wow how objective

It is only positive to a racist platform.

Nobody else with a soul would use that argument.

Racists are psychopaths and lack souls.

Now we're resorting to insults

That is why only racists use that argument.

it holds weight but you don't want to see it

you're so deluded

And anybody who says they are not a racist and uses that argument is a crypto racist.

You know it's wrong

but you want to maintain your happy little perspective

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjkgD4w9w1k

😉 Ta, ta bois

I refuse to step to your level. My world is not morally destitute.

so you've just admitted that you do not want to see from my viewpoint

i always knew tolerance and acceptance was a facade

I *can* see it from your viewpoint, and that's why I personally do not.

you only see one side to it

I see exactly the logic behind it.

It's displayed in your dialogue.

you see the logic to support a racist narrative

What are we bitching about?

I understand what you said.

but not to protect ones nation

you don't see the threat

or the potential for havoc it has

I see how you could hypothetically say it is positive to some other position.

because you dismiss it purely because it has racist undertones

But only racists actually, really, would say that.

People who have souls don't say things like that.

>it's racist so it needs to be censored and given no voice

i love the left

Is it wrong to be a racist? Recongizing races are real?