Because 100 million people don't die in capitalist third world countries each year
History does not repeat itself entirely in its context and at the times Marx predicted communism, violence was a necessity. However times have changed and I believe there are other options
http://www.ernestcline.com/spokenword/npa.htm
Nice one mate @Timo)))
>tfw TO SMART
Not an argument
You're saying socialism somehow kills more people than capitalism
It does
It's just not as popular, thank god
I need to screenshot this
and for good reasons
Where were the allied gulags at?
Do you really see a stable communist regime getting formed by force? By putting people in the range of weaponry?
It can be formed, sure however it will not last long
People need to be educated and socialism will bring itself
Anarchists outta here
It doesn't work
Kek
How do you conclude I am an anarchist
n-nani! he dodged that question like a pro!
Because you're saying compete factual errors such as socialism has killed more
In the countries they rule yes
Or did the U.S have gulags?
I already explained I am anarchist to at the point where communism is achieved and the authority is no longer necessary
When you completely disregard the fact that capitalism kills more than 100 million each year
>capitalism kills ppl >so revolution
Why would socialism not kill more in the third world?
Would they not have gulags?
or is that just a european thing
oh and chinese
Maybe because imperialism exists under capitalism
what?
You cite gulags as evidence
imperialism is dead
People will die in the third world no matter what, they need to be educated in order to properly sustain
Yes
>USA
Why wouldn't they exist in a third world country if socialism was there?
ye well nah
Although ego is right to say that there would be less deaths if imperialists let them be
