Message from @Spike

Discord ID: 347225981649682433


2017-08-16 03:23:47 UTC  

theres plenty of fash on pol

2017-08-16 03:25:44 UTC  

@National Trotskyist are you a commie?

2017-08-16 03:25:56 UTC  

Wait spike you are a ML right?

2017-08-16 03:26:01 UTC  

more or less, yes

2017-08-16 03:26:07 UTC  

Good

2017-08-16 03:26:13 UTC  

ML but ironically unironically nazbol

2017-08-16 03:26:20 UTC  

O

2017-08-16 03:34:32 UTC  

@Deleted User Oh nope lol, I'm socialist. Preaching communist or other totalitarian views is illegal where I live.

2017-08-16 03:36:51 UTC  

@Spike Interesting, are Nazbols MLs?

2017-08-16 03:37:01 UTC  

Ehh, sorta

2017-08-16 03:37:19 UTC  

Basically what the National Bolshevik party in Russia wanted

2017-08-16 03:37:24 UTC  

was a restoration of the Soviet empire

2017-08-16 03:37:37 UTC  

Not just Russia, they wanted back all the satellite states

2017-08-16 03:37:41 UTC  

and the geopolitical dominance

2017-08-16 03:37:45 UTC  

they were essentially red fascists

2017-08-16 03:42:27 UTC  

There might've been some antisemitism thrown in there too

2017-08-16 03:42:32 UTC  

But in modern day, or on the internet

2017-08-16 03:42:39 UTC  

Nazbol pretty much just means

2017-08-16 03:42:51 UTC  

being a communist with some reactionary views

2017-08-16 03:51:52 UTC  

man have any of u ever gone to poltical discourse

2017-08-16 03:52:05 UTC  

m?

2017-08-16 03:52:09 UTC  

the sever

2017-08-16 03:52:21 UTC  

Nope, what's it like?

2017-08-16 03:52:29 UTC  

Lol

2017-08-16 03:52:31 UTC  

Literally reverse Pol

2017-08-16 03:53:02 UTC  

and they hate communists

2017-08-16 03:54:31 UTC  

Hey guys. Serious discussion time. Do you guys get it when I say "the democracy that is not"?
I've been reading over soviet democracy in practice recently.
It really sounds like a good system of government.
Over coming both the failings of absolute autocracy and disconnected democracy/
Because the mass man has a direct say in the practice of the party and government
Numerous reports have shown that there was direct action within government and the work places.
Every supposed candidate for the last election (a confirmation vote)
would be scrutinized by the local workers and investigated by every single issue and positive.
As well, the candidate does not have to come from the party. They can be a teacher, steel worker, wood cutter, artisan. They can be any member of mass society, they aren't high corporate representatives or exclusive party members.
But if they hold the right ideals, good morality, and proper qualifications they can be selected by the both politically and economically concious workers.

2017-08-16 03:56:36 UTC  

see this is the kind of stuff u wouldnt see there, i maybe on the right, but i can appreciate how well read u guys are, sorry to distract from that

2017-08-16 03:56:43 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/347227147217141761/image.png

2017-08-16 03:57:09 UTC  

I'm on the social right and economic left.

2017-08-16 03:57:30 UTC  

Kewl

2017-08-16 03:57:33 UTC  

But recently, I've been attempting to look into alternative government forms.

2017-08-16 03:57:43 UTC  

Nah, you're socially conservative but fiscally liberal

2017-08-16 03:57:46 UTC  

It seems

2017-08-16 03:58:05 UTC  

the left-right paradigm is only there to describe economics

2017-08-16 03:58:12 UTC  

the right want to preserve capitalism

2017-08-16 03:58:16 UTC  

the left wants to get rid of it

2017-08-16 03:58:33 UTC  

For a long time, I was a consitu-

2017-08-16 03:58:34 UTC  

What?

2017-08-16 03:58:35 UTC  

No.

2017-08-16 03:58:41 UTC  

Being reactionary or progressive has nothing to do with right or left.