"their forward culture"....i mean building something so they could exploit the resources of a certain colony was definetly very nice of them to do for themselfs

Anprim pls

the colonies also improved, some african countries were argueable better off under british rule

No excuses for their horrible deeds

however to paint it as all bad is simply not fair

Was a means to an end

Otherwise you'd have the french running things

Aryan race superior

Genocide the colonies

France did a great job with haiti tbh

block stasi if you want, he'll add nothing

yeah, when kenyans was getting killed for being in their own land they were way better off then their current growing economy

the africans had their own slaves before the brits

^

you can't name me a succesful civilization that didn't do horrible things

they weren't looked down upon because of "race"....thats a European introduction

so either you're anti civilization or a utopian

What if he's both?

the whole European slave trade is sick

probably both

Ignore arab slave trade or african slave trade

Only the abolished ones are bad

@df what civilization do you like?

one that didn't die after 10 years preferably

Aren't there open slave markets in Lybia now?

probably, ISIS is there, but at least the mean dictator is gone!

figures....Muammar Gaddafi wants a united Africa and he gets killed with influence from the west

he was a tyrant however

according to your logic....

he was a lesser tyrant that the puppets the US would like to put in his place

Maybe, but I'm not arguing for interventionism

you're anti tiranny

u basically are this point

so good that he's gone right?

no i'm not

"but he was a tyrant"

right

he was

so blame your goverments for the "refugee crisis"

what?

you're against tiranny right?