Rly? Jesus fuck, cringe city much AntiFa?

Born to cringe

Please save me from the brown tide, pappa. I'm so weak and afraid. I cannot look out for myself. I need the state to do it for me.

Depends how well organised the brown tide is doesn't it? ^^

Not really.

So a non organised, non structured society would be able to defend itself from a modern army mobilised for extermination based total war?

You mean like Afghanistan?

I mean like WWIII

Only way to win would be to genocide or nuke everyone from orbit, even then it wouldn't kill everyone.

You misunderstand me. My qustion is: would a non organised society

Armies come and go. Occupation is never forever.

Tell that to the Polish Jews

I'm not familiar with that example.

WWII Jews in Poland

most of em just died...

Are the Nazi's still occupiying Poland?

No, but the jews got almost exterminated

Was the resistance successful?

no

the ghetto uprising failed - no survivors

RIP

warsaw ghetto I should say

(The later Warsaw uprising didn't fear much better either to be fair)

That's one sub population though. We need to be specific about what we are talking about. What do you mean by the arbitrary 'non-organised society'? What do you have in mind?

No clue, you the anarchist

So, you're basing it on an impression. That's not a very honest characterisation.

that wasn't really a war. That was state genocide

conducted by the occupiers

@DessertBeagle Yeah, as a means of conducting warfare

it was not warfare

it was genocide

My idea of anarchism is not restricted to borders and subpopulations.

@Deleted User Ok, explain what kind of society, that could still be described as anarchistic, would ever be able to withstand a modern state's genocidal whim?

But I would understand how a nationalist could be habituated to always think in these terms.

@DessertBeagle I don't see how the two are necesairly incompatibe

@Deleted User (I'm not a nationalist)

@Deleted User (unless by nationalist you mean a non-anarchist)

I don't know. I don't live in a fantasy world. I think in terms of here and now. Anarchism is an action nowadays against power structures. I'm not sure how a modern state would genocide people who are embedded all around the world.

warfare in the western world has always been subject to unstated rules, and the goal is not necessarily the extermination of the 'enemy' population. Once you get into that territory, it's genocide.

@Apollo'sJest Apologies, what is your politics?

@DessertBeagle Ok, but the entire point of Hitler's version of (eastern) warfare was germanisation or repalcement of the local population. That was the entire policy - that's why operation Barbarossa included entire divisions of mass executioners following the tank offenssive. To murder the locals. The German government did not want the population that it saw as a hasse, it wanted the land.