Then why not go for full anarchism like you said before

It is fun and keeps on giving.

giving what

Constant change, novelty, and verification of freedom.

A authoritarian socialist state?

No, anarchism does.

Then why bring up authoritarian socialism as a system after a revolution

why not stick to anarchism

Anarchism to me is not a system.

besides the point

I am just preparing for the most likely opposition after capitalist state.

Nope, you said if you cared about making something of the revolution you'd make it authoritarian socialist

it implies a preference for it

Yes, that is how I know it is likely. It is what I would do.

None of what you said implied likeliness, only your own preference

which was what I was asking about yesterday, your preference

Well, that is my understanding after studying political theory. You do not have to agree.

Horst Wessel wasn't even part of the SS

It's not about me agreeing, it's you having two contradicting thoughts

freedom on the one hand, authoritarian socialism on the other

Nazis should at least get facts right about their own people

@Deleted User

When you play chess and imagine your opponents next move, is that having two contradictory thought?

Are you antifa? also no one said horst wessel was in the SS

None of it implied you predicting the future

none of it

He is portrayed as having an SS helmet

A major historical inaccuracy

That is what their theory says. That is what I base it on, and the practice of history.

I didn't ask anyone else's idea but yours

And military camo when hottest Horst wasn't even part of the army

You came up with authoritarian socialism

Be a property nazi like me

*proper

Know your facts at least

I never made the fucking image

As far as revolutions go, USSR made the most of it.

Get the fuck off my back dude

im just here to shitpost

You shouldn't post something factually incorrect