Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 350964912207691780
In the short term, yes.
Seems weird for you to advocate for, seeing as you have issues with the current system because it's not free enough
It is specific to post revolution scenario. Not one wants to return to status quo, defeats the point of a revolution.
Then why not go for full anarchism like you said before
It is fun and keeps on giving.
giving what
Constant change, novelty, and verification of freedom.
A authoritarian socialist state?
No, anarchism does.
Then why bring up authoritarian socialism as a system after a revolution
why not stick to anarchism
Anarchism to me is not a system.
besides the point
I am just preparing for the most likely opposition after capitalist state.
Nope, you said if you cared about making something of the revolution you'd make it authoritarian socialist
it implies a preference for it
Yes, that is how I know it is likely. It is what I would do.
None of what you said implied likeliness, only your own preference
which was what I was asking about yesterday, your preference
Horst Wessel wasn't even part of the SS
It's not about me agreeing, it's you having two contradicting thoughts
freedom on the one hand, authoritarian socialism on the other
Nazis should at least get facts right about their own people
When you play chess and imagine your opponents next move, is that having two contradictory thought?
Are you antifa? also no one said horst wessel was in the SS
None of it implied you predicting the future
none of it
He is portrayed as having an SS helmet
A major historical inaccuracy
That is what their theory says. That is what I base it on, and the practice of history.
I didn't ask anyone else's idea but yours
And military camo when hottest Horst wasn't even part of the army
You came up with authoritarian socialism
Be a property nazi like me
*proper
Know your facts at least
I never made the fucking image
As far as revolutions go, USSR made the most of it.