Happiness is a spook.

Everyting that Humans have ever though is a spook

life matter is a spook

every type of atom is a spook

the number 69 is a spook

sexual relations are a spook

is spook the new buzzword

what is a spook

Some weird strange atheist BS tbh

There is one advantage Egoists have over Marxists. You have heard of class consciousness? Well, there is also ego consciousness. The idea of a spook is any ideological construct which prevents a person from understanding himself as an individual. Marxism has no equal term. What is the word for thing which prevents class consciousness? It is just seen as bourgeois ideology. This is why Egoism is liberating in the here and now and not an abstraction like Marxism.

Can't Marxists just adopt the term

They could try, but not without adopting Egoism.

they can barely feed themselves what makes you think for a seconde they could feed another mouth?

Idk, a Marxist can talk about supply and demand or division of labor without being a capitalist

Right

Not familiar with the tenants of egoism though. What's the division

a very bad game, as for the political term no idea

I thought it was obvious. Marx is too theoretical. Egoism is simply an exploration of the subjective world describing the objective process from here to there. Marx and Egoism are not exclusive concepts. They are complementary, but this is hard for many Communists to accept who still worship 70 year old ideas. Not even that Marx hated Stirner. It seems there could even be a fundamental conflict. And in today's expression, Tankies and Anarchists do not get along.

Rec some reading

I mean, there is a lot of reading. I read lots of literature first, Marx, Engels, Lenin and Soviet material first. Then I read Stirner, but only as a secondary source, because Marx tries to argue against him. It turns out after reading Stirner that he had some really good points. Of which I could not reject. This is the basis of my critique which you have thus far read about.

The only reading I've done so far of note is Proudhon's Why Property Is Theft

Which was very dry

But as a guy concerned with internal logic of counter arguments, it was a nice thought exercise to follow along

I can only talk about the sequence in which I learned things. I found Marx, also, to be extremely dry. I hated reading it. Lenin was my favourite of the communists, I would try to pick up his Selected Works in One Volume, that was a good read. But I cannot suggest to read Stirner before that, because Marx and Stirner were both apart of the same Young Hegelian group. I had to read lots of philosophy before this to understand what this group was about. This is the barrier of understanding Communism, you have to be a researcher and have the interest in it.

That's the context in which I can appreciate Stirner. I read tons of Philosophy. And building an understanding of Hegel is no joke.

sup lads

https://hiddenlolcdn.com/i/182724.jpg

wow 🅱igot!

https://hiddenlolcdn.com/i/182786.png FML

@Deleted User Are you still boxing a phantom? Why don't you step outside and show the strength of your ideas?

sweden and canada are probably competing on who's a bigger cuck

Sweden is the happiest place on earth

sweden is gay

What's wrong with being gay

your gay

Nope

@Zulaw everything is wrong

Nothing wrong with being gay. They can kill you and rape you with equal satisfaction.

@Zulaw faggots want people to accept them who they are, but they cant accept themselves who they are

i never said beng gay is wrong <:troll:312064734113431553> le me

People have been gay throughout history