Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 352724105553772544
Some people dream more than others.
This song makes you want to hold up the local 7-Eleven. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_csTPekxe7w
Government alphabet are tax sinks. On purpose.
Didn't know the government sang the alphabet, aren't they a little idk... old for that?
Alphabet agencies is what we call the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc. You obviously not involved in security.
Well.. I'm head of congress soooo..... these guys gave me a job there they talked about soem stuff don't remember what but, here I am now
people seem to be happy with the changes we are making
Happiness is a spook.
Everyting that Humans have ever though is a spook
life matter is a spook
every type of atom is a spook
the number 69 is a spook
sexual relations are a spook
is spook the new buzzword
what is a spook
Some weird strange atheist BS tbh
There is one advantage Egoists have over Marxists. You have heard of class consciousness? Well, there is also ego consciousness. The idea of a spook is any ideological construct which prevents a person from understanding himself as an individual. Marxism has no equal term. What is the word for thing which prevents class consciousness? It is just seen as bourgeois ideology. This is why Egoism is liberating in the here and now and not an abstraction like Marxism.
Can't Marxists just adopt the term
They could try, but not without adopting Egoism.
Idk, a Marxist can talk about supply and demand or division of labor without being a capitalist
Right
Not familiar with the tenants of egoism though. What's the division
a very bad game, as for the political term no idea
I thought it was obvious. Marx is too theoretical. Egoism is simply an exploration of the subjective world describing the objective process from here to there. Marx and Egoism are not exclusive concepts. They are complementary, but this is hard for many Communists to accept who still worship 70 year old ideas. Not even that Marx hated Stirner. It seems there could even be a fundamental conflict. And in today's expression, Tankies and Anarchists do not get along.
Rec some reading
I mean, there is a lot of reading. I read lots of literature first, Marx, Engels, Lenin and Soviet material first. Then I read Stirner, but only as a secondary source, because Marx tries to argue against him. It turns out after reading Stirner that he had some really good points. Of which I could not reject. This is the basis of my critique which you have thus far read about.
The only reading I've done so far of note is Proudhon's Why Property Is Theft
Which was very dry
But as a guy concerned with internal logic of counter arguments, it was a nice thought exercise to follow along
I can only talk about the sequence in which I learned things. I found Marx, also, to be extremely dry. I hated reading it. Lenin was my favourite of the communists, I would try to pick up his Selected Works in One Volume, that was a good read. But I cannot suggest to read Stirner before that, because Marx and Stirner were both apart of the same Young Hegelian group. I had to read lots of philosophy before this to understand what this group was about. This is the barrier of understanding Communism, you have to be a researcher and have the interest in it.
That's the context in which I can appreciate Stirner. I read tons of Philosophy. And building an understanding of Hegel is no joke.
sup lads
wow 🅱igot!
@Deleted User Are you still boxing a phantom? Why don't you step outside and show the strength of your ideas?
sweden and canada are probably competing on who's a bigger cuck
Sweden is the happiest place on earth
sweden is gay