Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 355916637708353536
actually in most languages that have an ng sound its pyongyang or similar
but w/e
Why did the Communists betray the Anarchists in Catalonia? 😢
@here can a syndicalist teach me about syndicalism?
I'm trying to research it
I'd be interested in learning about it, too
I want the world to explode and my dick to grow
Goodbye
Y
OWorld is fuck
Jews stay with the world, everyone get off.
What did he mean by this? What is "the essential" and why it is of highest importance?
@bread#0708
I think he was getting at a sort of completion of character and interaction with the world
The quote is about anti-materialism
I would very much like to understand how his idea of character transcends materialism.
He describes it in Ride the tiger, men among the ruins, and revolt against the modern world
he spoke of the metaphysical hero
Why is it more important than material reality?
I don't think he approaches it from that perspective
but I personally think that it is more important
The physical nature of something tells you nothing of it's utility or it's importance
Materialism has no future or past @Deleted User
>The physical nature of something tells you nothing of it's utility or it's importance
I fully agree with this. But then how to make the leap into the metaphysical? Seems like just idealism.
What's the problem with idealism? The metaphysical incorporates the material, obviously
or else it would have no base
Well, just because the material lacks an essence, doesn't mean you should just go on and invent one for it in the metaphysical.
That's a kind of replacement mythology.
And I'm not sure if that's better or worse than before.
I can follow the scepticism, but not the supposed solution.
So you agree with that there is a space that needs to be filled but you don't agree with the replacement? @Deleted User
Pretty much. I'm just stuck on the that. Which I why I like Stirner. It is content with the lack of identity of the self.
But lack of identity would mean the lack of the individual and therefore nihilism
and nihilism is destructive in itself
Destructive in the sense that it negates ontological delusions, or 'spooks'.