It seems equally if not more nonsensical than ancap

Because communism requires the state to own the property

But you can't have state owned property without a state

Chalin, I haven't read up on it but supporters of it are very defensive.

It should be called anarchomarxism or something else

If it is a legitimate ideology, it's name is poorly chosen

Oh boy. Where do I start and can I be bothered.

I can't.

How about the name. Is there a more accurate name for it?

Marxism uses Socialism to reach Communism. AnCom just detroys the state to achieve communism. I agree it's pretty retarded.

But there are insurrectionists who believe in continued fighting against the state post-revolution.

It hasn't been tried yet.

As I am aware it abolishes the state functions, capitalism and private property for common ownership. Not sure how that works.

Sounds too crazy for me to read and take seriously.

The main problem with anarchism is that in order for it to succeed post-revolution is resorts to authoritarianism through necessity.

I mean, in the past it has.

Its hard to prevent anarchy from devolving either into a state, or into barbarism

Insurrectionists think they can maintain an indefinite guerrilla war.

And this is seen as the height of Anarchist thought.

I unironically sympathised with this. Because it's fun.

I don't consider any violent means to be a legitimate way of dealing with a state who isn't violent to its own citizens

I mean if you thrive in an anarchist society it doesn't seem so bad. Don't know how long would last like that though.

The only reason the state exists is through threat of violence. Think about that.

I would hate to be a woman or a retard in anarchism.

I accept just violence used to maintain society.

Anarchism doesn't mean Chaos. This is somewhat a misunderstanding politically.

I think anarchism in all forms will lead to chaos. That's just my belief.

Alright.

I don't consider it bad when a state chooses to pacify a violent individual with controlled violence

Anarchism isn't sustainable, given human nature

Communists would agree.

Is this a communism server?

Anarchists think that people are generally good, that's their view on human nature and why they think it would work.

It's leftypol, what else would it be @Deleted User

That's like asking if the /pol/ Discord is a fascism server

It seems that Communists are unrepresented on the internet. But they make up for it. They are generally more well-read than their counterparts.

@Chalin Do you... Know what communism is?

It's mostly fascism with a sprinkle of ancap

@Anglican I'm not being 100% serious, or loyal to the correct definitions

I know what it is

> I'm not being 100% serious
Makes it hard to have a conversation.