Simply because the state is given so much control

Of course.

Everyone (who isn't an undesirable, woman, elderly, or child) is, in theory, a productive member of the workforce

That's one thing that really bothers me, many NatSocs and Fascists are basically full out patriachial goyim

Stalin had a better war economy.

Just cause you mentioned women. I've been told that women and men are DIFFERENT SPECIES

(???)

Ye, I hear that, it's ironic at best

They take a large step beyond acknowledging gender differences

That sounds more metaphorical, the way they say it

(Note: I'm Oktavia)

You have to remember that WW2 emerged out of the brutality of WW1 of the rise of Communism. All they care about is military.

I've seen it said in a more litteral sense

What was Stalin's wartime economy?

/pol/ doesn't discuss that much

It was likely War Communism

it was basically central planning on steriods.

No strikes, unions were directly state controlled, every able person (if not in the military) had to servee the war in some way.

Generally speaking this was working in a factory.

hmm

I know it was practiced during the Russian Revolutio.

*Revolution

I know more about what the economy produced, not the means in which it produced it

Quality vs quantity

And Russia's quality was its quantity

It always has.

Yep

I really get frustrated by moderate cuckservatives talking about socialism

Yea?

Yea, just saying. I'm reading through another channel.

They don't get it at fucking all

NatSocs get angry about quantity over quality. Like if you just admire quality enough it will magically change history.

**Squints the eyez**

Is that the little danger boy over there?

@Anglican Socialism is quite the broad and interesting range of beliefs, generalizing happens way too much with it.

Why aren't you a socialist?@Deleted User

Well, at least he gets it.

Because it only works in very small closed off communities.

>USSR is small closed off community