Message from @Your Favorite Martian =3
Discord ID: 359855553259765771
lol
when something goes wrong it's the government?
look at the chart closer
@EALootcrates But then you have to factor in that medical care is fucking expensive, even for a mega corporation, they will have to manage staff, facilities, buy medicine from big pharma, buy medical equipment and machinery, which all costs a shit ton of money.
see that most of the ratings
of norway
sweden
canada
denmark
france
are around 76
*7
Which means that they will almost always either hire shittier staff, pay them worse, or give lower quality care, or both.
well, isn't care expensive for the state too
Yes.
the state gives lower quality care too you know
if they don't make a profit out of it
@Deleted User Didn't social democracy originally meant what democratic socialism means today, before modern sozis have appropriated the term?
I think it was used in such a manner as the previous name of the Bolshevik Party.
the expenditures
are tough
Which when you combine that with having to manage hospitals, and equipment, it means that quality will almost always suffer, and lead to longer wait times, and worse care.
Phenian, what?
yes, bernie confuses demsoc and socdem
single payer healthcare in america would be a disaster
300 million people
not paying a dime
for the expensive-ass healthcare they're receiving
@Your Favorite Martian =3 Healthcare is a very difficult thing to manage, both economically and politically.
the quality of healthcare would lower
and the GDP percentage put into it
would skyrocket
no profit would come out of it
no profit?
do healthy people not produce profit?
an estimated 155 million people
under 65
were insured
@Deleted User They do, but you would have to hope that the costs and profits would even out in those terms.
healthcare in the US
has been costing less and less