Message from @olev

Discord ID: 364204369819729920


2017-10-02 00:13:11 UTC  

Furthermore, he was quietly opposed by those who had been alive during WWI.

2017-10-02 00:13:21 UTC  

Didn't JFK love him

2017-10-02 00:13:27 UTC  

He totally did

2017-10-02 00:13:32 UTC  

>unironically buying into nazi propaganda

2017-10-02 00:13:40 UTC  

so did several other nationalists and patriots

2017-10-02 00:13:47 UTC  

You can't blame them, they wouldn't want to go to war after having experienced one already

2017-10-02 00:13:48 UTC  

Reminder he got this support due to anti-communism.

2017-10-02 00:13:55 UTC  

But that doesn't say anything about him as a leader

2017-10-02 00:13:57 UTC  

i mean u cant just use fallacies like that you have to attack the concept of national socialism itself

2017-10-02 00:14:03 UTC  

which is economically left wing is it not

2017-10-02 00:14:12 UTC  

"legend"
-JFK

2017-10-02 00:14:28 UTC  

There is no separation of the economic and political.

2017-10-02 00:14:39 UTC  

but there is a seperation of economic and cultural

2017-10-02 00:14:50 UTC  

National Socialism was envisaged as an expressly anti-socialist response

2017-10-02 00:15:03 UTC  

Because if that wasn't the case, German industrialists would have been fucked.

2017-10-02 00:15:56 UTC  

There was already one revolution in Germany, and there was about to be another if the KPD organized more power. Their natural instinct was to support Hitler and keynesian policies.

2017-10-02 00:16:48 UTC  

i dont get it

2017-10-02 00:16:55 UTC  

so the name just contradicts its own meaning by definition

2017-10-02 00:17:29 UTC  

whether or not hitler precisely used the concept of national socialism isnt really relevant but the actual meaning of it

2017-10-02 00:18:08 UTC  

Hitler had his own definition of socialism, that wasn't economic related at all

2017-10-02 00:18:21 UTC  

"National Socialism" is still capitalist, natsocs don't like to admit it

2017-10-02 00:18:27 UTC  

in what way

2017-10-02 00:18:29 UTC  

good night

2017-10-02 00:18:43 UTC  

define 'national socialism' then

2017-10-02 00:18:48 UTC  

>it says socialism so it must be socialist

2017-10-02 00:19:06 UTC  

I guess the DPRK is a democratic people's republic then

2017-10-02 00:19:34 UTC  

so then two feet means three feet?

2017-10-02 00:20:39 UTC  

National socialism supports people as a community, as cogs in a machine. It isn't 100% comparable to actual socialism, but it's against this idea that corporations can shit all over everyone

2017-10-02 00:21:08 UTC  

Iirc there were some socialistic measures

2017-10-02 00:21:20 UTC  

Earlier guy mentioned pregnant women and so forth

2017-10-02 00:21:33 UTC  

They support their people, they don't just let them starve, etc

2017-10-02 00:21:37 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/364205247884951562/main-qimg-7efe5842f200660dc2b7ce743f852f5e-c.png

2017-10-02 00:21:38 UTC  

>they still think socialism is the government doing stuff

2017-10-02 00:21:47 UTC  

Can't read German

2017-10-02 00:21:53 UTC  

By this logic socialists may as well bow to the feet of FDR.

2017-10-02 00:22:23 UTC  

Don't know that image, don't know who drew it, don't know if it's legitimate, don't know how it's even remotely relevant

2017-10-02 00:22:47 UTC  

It's a political cartoon showcasing what national socialism really was.

2017-10-02 00:23:01 UTC  

Also

2017-10-02 00:23:13 UTC  

"National socialism thinks that corporations shouldn't shit all over people"