Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 381235014349881367


2017-11-18 00:08:00 UTC  

I do, US is doing good in their capitalism, why should a "permanent revolution" come in and possible fuck over the economy

2017-11-18 00:08:14 UTC  

@montvid So you are a capitalist?

2017-11-18 00:08:23 UTC  

I'm a Stalin loving commie

2017-11-18 00:08:30 UTC  

but US is doing fine

2017-11-18 00:09:02 UTC  

So capitalism is fine to you?

2017-11-18 00:09:04 UTC  

and I don't want to be trot which "permanent revolution" might fuck up more people than other forms of communism might

2017-11-18 00:09:08 UTC  

How would it fuck over the economy

2017-11-18 00:09:21 UTC  

I don't know, it might.

2017-11-18 00:09:24 UTC  

What kind of commie gives a shit about the capitalist economy?

2017-11-18 00:09:33 UTC  

@Deleted User A LARPer

2017-11-18 00:09:39 UTC  

🤔

2017-11-18 00:09:41 UTC  

ok

2017-11-18 00:09:44 UTC  

@olev HAH, you are not wrong about that.

2017-11-18 00:09:49 UTC  

By the way, the US probably is going to be the last country to become socialist

2017-11-18 00:10:02 UTC  

ok

2017-11-18 00:10:18 UTC  

@olev *Not when the day of rope comes and we take it over and begin the formation of the organic state*

2017-11-18 00:10:48 UTC  

Just the revolution must be exported from the third world to the first world because the first world has the necessary productive forces to lead socialism

2017-11-18 00:10:56 UTC  

Whereas if it's a backwards country like russia

2017-11-18 00:11:28 UTC  

A bureaucracy arises because they can't handle the problems that have already been solved by countries that have advanced capitalism

2017-11-18 00:11:33 UTC  

In all seriousness, socialism has little chance of remerging as a dominant form of ideology in a country today.

2017-11-18 00:11:50 UTC  

The USSR made it really unappealing.

2017-11-18 00:12:00 UTC  

The USSR wasn't socialist

2017-11-18 00:12:10 UTC  

>Muh not real socialist
How so?

2017-11-18 00:12:16 UTC  

Okay first of all

2017-11-18 00:13:32 UTC  

In the marxist sense, socialism is a mode of production where production is for use, coordinated by economic planning and distributed according to contribution via labor vouchers

2017-11-18 00:13:34 UTC  

@montvid Take note big jew,I feel like there is a big paragraph coming up.

2017-11-18 00:13:45 UTC  

Obviously this can not co-exist with capitalism

2017-11-18 00:14:04 UTC  

@olev No shit, the USSR tried that and it died.

2017-11-18 00:14:12 UTC  

WAIT A MINUTE

2017-11-18 00:14:16 UTC  

Labor vouchers?

2017-11-18 00:14:17 UTC  

The USSR had money and commodity production

2017-11-18 00:14:19 UTC  

Yes

2017-11-18 00:14:21 UTC  

You mean currency?

2017-11-18 00:14:21 UTC  

Labor vouchers

2017-11-18 00:14:40 UTC  

Labor vouchers aren't transferable and you can't amass them

2017-11-18 00:14:47 UTC  

Jeez, for a jew like marx to rebrand money in a such a way, he was pretty clever.

2017-11-18 00:15:33 UTC  

So you just get taxed out the ass and you can't store them to places like banks?

2017-11-18 00:17:35 UTC  

@olev You there big jew? Did your internet go out or something?

2017-11-18 00:18:40 UTC  

I'm not a jew

2017-11-18 00:18:56 UTC  

What do you mean taxed out the ass

2017-11-18 00:18:58 UTC  

There is no tax