Well my view is this, if they are really and truly interested and dedicated to doing their job, eventually they will excel at it

Yes, practice does make perfect after all.

So if this person is making a shit product now, in time he may make the best product if he really likes doing it

Yes, that is what I am talking about, when I say that he should be given time to practice to become compitent in producing it.

Is there some kind of threshold or balance system for determining how “well-suited” a person is to assign them to a job?

Like in fascism how does the government determine where a person will work

If there is no free choice

@Brickiest Brick Remember what I said earlier about the product being graded on how much it benefits society.

Yes I do remember

What I meant to say, is that when a person is given a task to produce a product, it should be graded on how much it can benefit society, if it is inadequte, then they would be tasked with practicing to become better at their job, and if they still cannot do it, then they would have to be given a different job that they are better at.

People practice at different rates, though

It may take one person 1 month to create the ideal product while another may take 6 months

Mhm.

That is why the amount of time we would have to give to people would have to be based on what they are as a person.

AKA, on a case by case basis.

Alright so what you’re saying is freedom of choice is allowed?

At least to an extent

A limited extent, but yes, it takes some freedom for a person to realize what they are best at.

Why would this idea be worse under a capitalistic system

Would the person not choose the job they would in a fascist society

Well, when they reached the age when they needed to begin providing for themselves, they would be assigned by the government to whatever job they worked the best in, though in some cases people may have to work jobs they could be happier in, if they work their best and did what they were best in, then they would benefit society much better as a whole.

One thing that should be noted, is that when people are forced upon one path, they focus much more on that one path, in order to become better at it.

I do not recall if I read that from iron march, or mein kampf, but it is still worthy of the notation, regardless.

That makes a lot of sense I will say that I agree

But now there's the question of how this type of government works

If it's all up to the government and the government supplies all the jobs and materials, is it really possible to sustain this in the long term?

Because in a socialist or communist government nationalizing industry usually leads to disaster, so how would this type work

Ah yes, this is where the big divergence in fascism and communism comes into play, where a worker in a communist or socialist government is given everything they are needed by a factory, (Or at least that is the theory.), a fascist worker is obligated to provide for himself, one way or another, the state would play very little role in actually giving people supplies/materials for living.

Ah ok

So would there be private businesses? How would government regulate businesses and supply jobs?

Private business would exist in very little capacity, at most it would be trading/bargaining groups, the government would keep an extremely watchful eye on them, in order to make sure they do not begin scamming people.

How would the public businesses work

Everyone would just be working for the government then

In a sense; they would be, to put it bluntly.

How would the economy work exactly

Would the government regulate the economy

And how do workers get paid

The economy would most likely be in a complete whreck after the helter skelter, with global trade not being seen for an extremely long time, it is likely that the economy itself will be primarily localized and agrigarian. The government would control most if not all of the economy as a whole, workers would be paid with a currency not based off of hardly anything other than the amount of money that is produced, workers would use it to exchange for items that they would need for living.

So there is no more class system like in capitalism

No low, middle and high classes

There would be, but there would be little difference.