So there isn’t a definition

There's variance in defintions between marriem webster, oxford, ect

So there isn’t a set definition

We are back to olevism now

What the fuck are you on about

That socialism has no definition

You don’t even agree with it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

“There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them”

So there is no set definition

There are many

Most socialists agree on that socialism is the social ownership and democratic management of the means of production

But that doesn't include the mode of production

lets control the means of reproduction

olev

i might be a communist if it were nationalistic

maybe

Can you cite where most socialists believe that

I mean if you go on r/socialism they literally have the definition on the sidebar

So r/socialism is most socialists

What do you expect, a fucking poll/

There's different words for a reason

If you are so bold to say hitler wasn’t a socialist then give me a definition that is set

There's a reason "social democracy" is a seperate word from socialism

Social democrats are not socialists

If the definition can be changed then he was a socialist

He isn't a socialist

He was a social democrat economically

So anyways

I linked that

He privatized state industries

Ok but most things bernie is a socialist

Bernie is a social democrat

I know but modern People think it’s the same

>modern people

You mean americans

That don't know anything about socialism

Hitler took the name socialist to appeal to the commies in germany

Hitler didn't found the party

Simple as that

Also