That they, being the suffering disillusioned majority deserve better and had better seize that conception of better

Not for other people, but for themselves.

Do you believe that "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is a good idea?

@Cam He probably does if he is a communist

Explain why.

Its why they confederate, not because oh help everyone else, but because they realize it's the easiest way to help themselves

Its why humanity socializes in general

Both LOAVE and Asa if he thinks the idea is a good one.

And getting back to your chiefdom bit, those arise out of the "legitimized" use of force

Not simply evolving through conversation at random through evolution

There are plenty of societies of literal equals

People who simply "exist"

Entirely horizontal in power structure

"societies of literal equals"
Example.

One moment

@Cam Revolutionary Catalonia , Makhnovia and Kibbutz,all very successful communist socties.

I'll continue this later. Having some spiced rum and a meal.

Lol I can't get access to my pdfs without using a school log in I don't have

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirahã

But also this

And apparently Peter Gelderloos "The Rise of Hierarchy"

Also details why tribes adopt a hierarchy in the first place

Whereas others don't

Daily reminder that communism is a failure

Because success is measured entirely on the ability of something to violently repress other things, or not be repressed itself.

You must first fail to succeed #inspiration

Lol

Capitalism is also bad

Since the jews relay upon it

Are you a Korean nazi

:l

Syndicalist

National syndicalist

Oof

Who are more neurotic, Jews or Koreans? It’s a tossup for me

And monarchist

Really tired of all these variations

I know what syndicalism is

And it finds common goal with communism

What is "national syndicalism"

The idea of a racial hierarchy