Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 594265344105906199


2019-06-28 20:32:58 UTC  

you cant move when you are detained

2019-06-28 20:33:31 UTC  

But I agreed to these rules, did I not?

2019-06-28 20:33:48 UTC  

Did you

2019-06-28 20:34:16 UTC  

and are you saying that a anarcist doesnt changes his or hers mind when it pleases teh anarachist

2019-06-28 20:34:29 UTC  

you think the anarcist will turn in to a confirmist ?

2019-06-28 20:34:32 UTC  

They can change their minds and associate with different people altogether.

2019-06-28 20:34:51 UTC  

That's what they want to say.

2019-06-28 20:35:03 UTC  

No because the government you argreed with is now prosecuting you because you broke the agreed upon rules

2019-06-28 20:35:28 UTC  

Is the coin dropping yet why you cant have governments when you are anarcist

2019-06-28 20:36:20 UTC  

Some anarchists would instead say 'well, no, they should just be driven out of that group instead, and they can try again with another one'.

2019-06-28 20:36:58 UTC  

So that would be dictatorship

2019-06-28 20:37:11 UTC  

No, because one would be able to associate with other people.

2019-06-28 20:37:17 UTC  

Wtf

2019-06-28 20:37:31 UTC  

I'm using what I think their arguments are.

2019-06-28 20:37:41 UTC  

if you get driven out by a anarchist government, you will jsut associate with others ?

2019-06-28 20:37:46 UTC  

Yes!

2019-06-28 20:37:57 UTC  

They'd say that finding alternatives should be easy.

2019-06-28 20:38:00 UTC  

But now you just assumed again

2019-06-28 20:38:07 UTC  

you assumed that the agreement was banishment

2019-06-28 20:38:10 UTC  

instead of death

2019-06-28 20:38:18 UTC  

you simply created a strawmen

2019-06-28 20:38:34 UTC  

Some anarchists would say that there would not need to be any death involved.

2019-06-28 20:38:40 UTC  

Simply the cutting of social ties.

2019-06-28 20:38:55 UTC  

Some anarchist would say that it is okay to have a government that banishes ppl

2019-06-28 20:39:05 UTC  

?

2019-06-28 20:39:07 UTC  

really??

2019-06-28 20:39:31 UTC  

Yes, but the argument is that they can still get what they want through another collective...

2019-06-28 20:39:56 UTC  

But they are forced out

2019-06-28 20:39:58 UTC  

by rules

2019-06-28 20:40:07 UTC  

something that is anti anarcist 😄

2019-06-28 20:40:37 UTC  

They are forced out of their homes , away from their friends

2019-06-28 20:40:43 UTC  

because the government said so

2019-06-28 20:40:51 UTC  

Thats more of a domocrazy

2019-06-28 20:41:08 UTC  

Not really anacy now is t

2019-06-28 20:41:11 UTC  

Again, rules aren't anti-anarchist, and enforcement of those rules is not statist as far as anarchists are concerned.

2019-06-28 20:41:42 UTC  

It can be done in a way which doesn't unnecessarily make a perpetrator suffer more than they need to.

2019-06-28 20:42:09 UTC  

But that would mean that theere is a hiercayy

2019-06-28 20:42:23 UTC  

thate theer is a power greater then the person that controls the person 😄

2019-06-28 20:42:49 UTC  

But that person would be able to control that power too to the greatest extent, the anarchists would say.

2019-06-28 20:43:08 UTC  

No because that person is bansihed by set person with set power

2019-06-28 20:43:24 UTC  

and what causes the person to leave? force perhaps 😄