>no nuance

pretty dertemative words

>oh, but here's determinative nuance!

*Consistency.*

o reall

enlighten us

where is the nuance when you say to do what one fucking wants

i think thats pretty absolute

And you're assuming what I mean.

there are butss>

Again, I mean that it's a provisional thing.

then you are not doing what ever you fucking want

What one wants is a historical thing...

what is this historical thing you keep mentiong

It's about getting there, and then discovering that there's more, and getting further ad infinitum.

Maybe it's called... the movement of the social world itself.

so communism is not doing what ever you want, its a exploration proccess

why do you say that it is doing what ever you fucking want then ? when you are confined to social structures and collective goals

It is only 'doing what one fucking pleases' as much as it fits this process, which advances the 'doing of what one fucking pleases'.

The point is to change that structure.

And to change those goals.

yeah but those derive from necceity that comes from the collective

to which you then need to submit

But then that collective is itself influenced by individuals.

creating conformism and destroying your "do what you fucking want" thing

The collective is not a separate thing from individuals.

as you are now submitting to a collective and follow that cause

Conformity to what? The goal of making other goals easier to obtain?

lol thats vague

theer are more present needs at first

and mostly

so no

conformity to the sustaining of the collective comes first

Why not the sustaining of individuals who make up the collective instead?

Why not some individuals over others?

And when whe look at sovjet russia confirmity was forced

>muh soviets

jep the sovjets

you know that historical thing

Again, they had to fight off counterrevolutionary forces who were hellbent on destroying the revolution.

That does not mean that we are doomed to having to use this kind of suppression.