We have things drilled into them, extended from them, cloaked around them.
Even *capitalism* demands this.
You are talking about having your gentic potential demished by chemicals
No, you're talking about genetic potential.
I'm saying that even if you focussed on that, we can modify it.
i dont see how this proves you can increase a presons ability beyond its determinate gentic make up
'chemicals' isn't the only focus.
It was merely *an example*, and you still haven't proved your case regarding it.
You can only condition the potential so much
>matrix >capitalism
you are talking about conditional factors such as nutrcioun
This is in teh gentic potential
And the genes can't be modified?
Nutrition
Not of a living thing
for the next generations maybe
>for the next generations
Then what do you think we should do?
yeah thats how it works with genes
**Maybe we should make that editing a reality?**
are you know with teh moddified crops that are made with gene introduction?
But at that point you changed the biological being
Yes.
and you have a new generation
And their subjectivity still remains if they have any.
If I cut off my leg, I can still think.
Just so you know it takes thents of thousands of specimen to get the desireble trait
or modification
Right now it does.
That doesn't mean that it always has to.
The point is to refine our technologies.
lol
just as one day we will have infinite resources because we recycle so well
which btw has the flaw of energy loss
I never said that. You are raising something that's difficult into an abstract impossibility.
*and in that way, you actually make it more difficult by saying that it shouldn't be pursued.*
you argued that with recycling and such we could some what achieve a infinte resource base increasing resources and such 😄
@Garbage @Deleted User remind me where you from, guys?
I didn't say that. I said that things waste away, so even then, that wouldn't work.
fact is that we dont have gene modification that works 100%
Nothing works 100%. What's your point?
