Is it always a negative way?

you make the state ment that you can make ppl go beyong their gentic potential with the use of tech

What about things like folic acid, iron, all that shit?

so i ask for clarification what this magical tech is that makes ppl smarter

>magical

It's already here.

Yiou are talking about having a good fuctional biolgial system

>making a flawless argument >impliieing

that system is still bound by its gentic potential

Then your focus is limited, since we are not reducible to our biology.

Offenders head half dead at times

Nok-nok

And we're not bound by our biological bodies.

We have things drilled into them, extended from them, cloaked around them.

Even *capitalism* demands this.

You are talking about having your gentic potential demished by chemicals

No, you're talking about genetic potential.

I'm saying that even if you focussed on that, we can modify it.

i dont see how this proves you can increase a presons ability beyond its determinate gentic make up

'chemicals' isn't the only focus.

It was merely *an example*, and you still haven't proved your case regarding it.

You can only condition the potential so much

>matrix >capitalism

you are talking about conditional factors such as nutrcioun

This is in teh gentic potential

And the genes can't be modified?

Nutrition

Not of a living thing

for the next generations maybe

>for the next generations

Then what do you think we should do?

yeah thats how it works with genes

**Maybe we should make that editing a reality?**

are you know with teh moddified crops that are made with gene introduction?

But at that point you changed the biological being

Yes.

and you have a new generation

And their subjectivity still remains if they have any.

If I cut off my leg, I can still think.

Just so you know it takes thents of thousands of specimen to get the desireble trait

or modification