We're talking about how people are irreducible to biologies.
i reply on what you said relating to the long term change withe in ones body
you can only do this when you grow and devolop
>implying this growth can't be accelerated
the tech to morph the body of a living being in to something more advandced is a idilic future view
Why is it idyllic?
What makes it so besides the fact that we simply can't do it now?
Our lack of success?
because it doesnt exists yet and it is pretty far fetched
So was flying to international destinations for someone who was stuck in the Stone Age.
the dramatic change that would be and it going well is idilic
Nice try.
a reach
The reality is that you're not helping to make those technologies real.
A lacl of succes? where is this comment comment comg from
You don't want to be part of any political movement which wants such a thing.
nice try ?you accused me of seing the future and being wrong
"Our lack of success" at being changelings.
but you can just make the predictions right
I'm not saying that it will exist, I'm saying that there's nothing to ultimately stop it.
There are are roadblocks, in fact.
One is our incompetence at using resources.
That's a limitation which is not inherent at a given level.
Its manifestations are not set in stone. We can learn to do things.
The second limitation is about a political fight.
It is about the aims of those who hold the means of production.
Even if theer was the ability to change dna of a living being to morph the living being which hasnt been know in nature ever , it would still be a massive resource drain to make every one equal true gentic manipulation
nor would it be desitable as you create a mono crop
and it would be genocide
>it didn't exist in nature
Do you know a example
Nor did an understanding of quantum physics.
Not an argument.
>massive resource drain
Compared to what? Our present resources?
You complain about ppl holding the means of production
but are yo a consumer or a producer
Yes, people with an *exclusive and dominant interest*.
Are you about to argue 'muh iPhones'?
you have this differnce , if every one would be a producer we would have zero need for a system or a state
but not every one is
