and at the moment it self i said they are simular but not the same thihng

yet you spin your wheels so much

making more silly comments

such as you are free to do what you want in communis, whilst you have to choose to submit or we communism will stomp you

Ugh. Here we go again, this is why I made a distinction between two different kinds of political institution and called them 'state' and 'government' respectively.

Regardless of what they are called, you still didn't manage to get me on this point, which is why I'm going to repeat myself *again*.

Not just that the display of ego, in which you are supposedly teh soul and mind of comminsm./ like what diagnoses did they give you. Im nearly asking out of intrest

Yet again: we don't want to kill anyone even for the sake of our principles; we only need to enslave their gods as far as that's concerned. The problem is that the Communist movement is not yet powerful enough to do this, and this has never been true in history leading up to now. There are forces who won't listen to us and fight with us because we don't have the means of demonstrating to them that we can fight for them, and so they will fight us to protect their struggles regardless of how accurately they identify themselves as individuals and their struggles too.

***The point of the abolition of both classes and more generally the politics where exclusive interests fight as exclusive interests rather than as part of a universal movement is that there would be no need for conflicts to be resolved through the death and/or submission of one interest exclusively to another.***

Oke repeat yourself again as you dont have a single connection to this world.

Yes, even though I am right in this world, I somehow have no connection to it.

You are not right, i pointed out your wrongs several times

There is an irony here. You kept talking about 'freedom' as if it's some abstract thing.

and here you make another

if communism is what you say it is, then it would not be communism until you have reached that point of absolute communist force to be communist

and in that in it self communism your communism is oppresive and destructive

Again, you admit that you're dealing with perfections and absolutes - things which can never exist. But Communism does not give a shit about those.

>and in that in it self communism your communism is oppresive and destructive
Says the nazi pretending to be communist

That's why Marx talks about 'the real movement to abolish the present state of things' rather than 'a state of affairs to be established'.

well buttzo had to say some shit

We don't care about your frozen ideas. They're useless to us. They're either mundane truisms or impossible things which we can't even conceive of in concrete terms.

like which frozen ideas

you stay so vague in your dodges

Buttzo

'So vague', when I mentioned it over and over again.

"What makes it different from Fascism or even what you call 'fascism' is that Communists don't say 'freedom is impossible, why bother'. Instead, we say that the impossibility of your frozen idea of 'freedom' does not mean that concrete freedoms are impossible."

That's a new one

I commend you on your creativity

So much for being vague.

@Garbage > goes on not naming these "ideas"

Read the screenshots.

how is it frozen idea, when you want freedom of determination

It's because you imagine it as something that must be beyond material conditions.

maybe im anarchist

And then you say 'well, we submit to those material conditions'.

communism is that you know

you have a need of the ppl and you need to work to create matirals for the ppl