and still are in denail

Beaver 2003 said that there were social factors *and* genetic factors.

i havent proven that link lol

yeah so

if your parrents have the maoa alle that means they have a higher likelyhood of being shit parrents

the star grasping oif you is ludecris

Yes, but *what else causes them to be shit parents*?

their parrents haveing maoa alle

That's not the only factor, hence why I asked 'what else'?

You can't read.

so the parrents have shit genetics,. so they create a shit enviorment for the offspring with shit genetics

how is this cogeetive disocance to you
?

And the social structures which are enforced on them are also owed to their genetics?

Or someone else's?

i cant read when i am not the one saying it is only the enviorment or genetics

yet you still think im saying it is just the genetics and trying to get me on this

when there is nothing to get

as you are using strawmen, a mis assumtion to argue agasint

which you have been doing for days

I never argued that it was just about genetics or just about the 'environment'.

social structers

I said it was *both*.

you mean the hand outs lmao

Not just handouts, but political movements.

what about the social structure of the chines?

And also family structures.

Is that owed to biology?

the family structure is created by themself

and thus by the nature they hve

Why? Because they had it within them?

Its both . funny how you think that every one is just equal

And why *those* particular family structures?

I never said that, I said that we are really unequal.

Why do you grasp at straws?

so if we are very un equal. why is it so hard that to understand that there is biolical determanism

Because inequality does not mean biological determinism.

Again, I can refer to the split subject idea.

If I say that I am determined by biology, then I must also account for me saying and thinking this.

bioliogical unequality does not mean biological determuinassim ?