That aside, why did you even bother to take it?

Also, you neglect to tell me just how much you took.

```Most of the "arguemnets" you aghev made in these past weeks are like this, you assumesomething imply and then go on some musguided rant that isnt even correct with the strawmen you just made as you have no knowledge of the actaul subject.
```

Maximum projection here.

***You inserted your own meanings of the terms 'government', 'state', 'freedom' and 'submission' into all of what I was saying, relying on those terms even when I was working through that argument. This was the whole 'frozen abstraction' controversy.***

***__It was you who kept confusing the existence of a certain configuration of society in a certain time frame with the existence of class society, which requires some kind of partially-conscious maintenance of that state of affairs.__***

I already fucking made this distinction based on the fact that a common ground could be established upon which conflicts which could potentially erupt into exclusive struggles which fight for dominance would not erupt into that. This requires the use of the commons of reasoning, language and so on.

Even if people appear to be entirely different, *there is still this commonality which can be used to unify them*!

***It is the world of human action as subjects.***

**You defended biological determinism and biological reductionism in order to say that there can never be a commons, and that people will always be inherently different in a way which cannot be overcome through the use of reasoning and politics. Round in circles you went, brandishing statistics as if they meant something by themselves, making assumptions all over the shop and ignoring the epistemological gap that I raised over and over again using the 'infinite studies' argument!**

```more implying :smile: and it must be hard for you not to reply right away afte you got pinged :smile: @Garbage```

***__>implying I'm here when you ping me despite no evidence to back up this claim__***

Do you like films and work presentations?

```Someone whith more things in their life doesnt sits on disord righting essays about nothing and then even edit most of em
inb4 no u. i dont edit and write with 180 keystrokes a min```

This doesn't even take a large chunk out of my free time.

I don't write with 180 keystrokes a minute, by the way, it's more like 300. So you could've improved your case even more but it still wouldn't work.

***You assume so much about me and then project the general act of you making assumptions right back onto me.***

Lastly, kratom is not an opiate *but it contains two opioid substances*.

Mitragynine and hydroxymitragynine.

It gets worse. Per Wikipedia:

```As of 2018, there is growing international concern about a possible threat to public health from kratom use.[1][2][11] In some jurisdictions, its sale and importation have been restricted, and several public health authorities have raised alerts.[1][2][22] Kratom is a controlled substance in 16 countries[11] and, in 2014, the FDA banned importing and manufacturing of kratom as a dietary supplement.[23] In the United States, there is consideration to make it a Schedule I drug.[24] Sometimes, the finished product is mixed with other psychoactive drugs, such as caffeine and codeine.[12][25]```

Furthermore, depending on your use of the drug, how much you've taken and your biological reception of the drug, the effects that it has can vary.

You say that you took it five times. Again, *how much did you take*?

If you took a considerable amount, then why brag about not being a junkie when you've been dumb enough to do something like that with yourself?

Also, *where'd you get that shit from*? Who would sell a substance like that to you?

Why would you even bother taking it in the first place?

One more thing. You don't edit your shit and type as fast as I do, but you go on at least two servers and sperg about shit. You reach for documents, splurge images all over the place, and you type out walls.

You treat this damn thing like it's a cheap knockoff of a /pol/ archival thread.

Throwing 'no u's in my direction won't work as well as you think because I don't pump up any pride I have based on 'not giving a shit' in precisely the same way that you do. I give a shit about you because you are a punching bag. Eventually you'll get boring if you don't do something stupid.

In fact, *you're nothing but a way for me to remind myself of all the fucking controversies and points that I often forget about*.

Maybe I should be thanking you because now my understanding of Communism is even more refined in reaction to all your insinuations. You've lost both on the theory front and on the 'convince them to shut up' front. All you've got left is to troll.

***And boy, being an American junkie contrarian kid, have you made that your actual focus.***

tl dr.

i am guessing its mostly asumtion, with a sprinkle of slander with out a actaul arguement

guessing, huh? that's a bad sign

yeah I think this means he's given up

Guessing is better then assuming wrong, which is what happens a lot here

I mean, i could jhust talk about his attampts of slander . me drinking kratom. lol/ At first he was talking about enhancing ppl ny use of biochemestry. But than has this fit of slander if some one actaully uses stimulants 😄 its called flip flopping and being a hypocrite

fruter more it it stil not proving that you can push beyond biological potential 😄

Btw, the hatred against substance use is further more proving that he doesnt understands communism and freedom or having a evolution and revolution of thought even further supported by the dogmas he holds . He is represive and facist whilst not being able to make a concise argument that isnt riddled with slander and assumtion that doesnt even holds up as strawmen

It is fuynny tho that garbage needs da commie jew and @me for support 😄