In fact, *you're nothing but a way for me to remind myself of all the fucking controversies and points that I often forget about*.

Maybe I should be thanking you because now my understanding of Communism is even more refined in reaction to all your insinuations. You've lost both on the theory front and on the 'convince them to shut up' front. All you've got left is to troll.

***And boy, being an American junkie contrarian kid, have you made that your actual focus.***

tl dr.

i am guessing its mostly asumtion, with a sprinkle of slander with out a actaul arguement

guessing, huh? that's a bad sign

yeah I think this means he's given up

Guessing is better then assuming wrong, which is what happens a lot here

I mean, i could jhust talk about his attampts of slander . me drinking kratom. lol/ At first he was talking about enhancing ppl ny use of biochemestry. But than has this fit of slander if some one actaully uses stimulants 😄 its called flip flopping and being a hypocrite

fruter more it it stil not proving that you can push beyond biological potential 😄

Btw, the hatred against substance use is further more proving that he doesnt understands communism and freedom or having a evolution and revolution of thought even further supported by the dogmas he holds . He is represive and facist whilst not being able to make a concise argument that isnt riddled with slander and assumtion that doesnt even holds up as strawmen

It is fuynny tho that garbage needs da commie jew and @me for support 😄

she kicked your ass just fine without support

all we're doing is confirming the kill here

That is just your opinion.

I dont see any valid non assumtion argument to anything i have said

let allone argument

its a bit of termonolgy name dropping that is mostlt of the time out of place

and a lot of dodges

like the whole, genetic heritage isnt a thing because they look at the data in the past , and you have a things such a neuroplasticity

which is just silly as the bounds of the plasticity is just set by gentics .

but then only dodges.

you are just a bunch of pidgeons if you think there is a "confirmed kill"

Your bias lead to a blindness for actaul fact @DA GOMMIE JOO the tears you have from me existing makes you ignore things .

take this for example

I never even spoke abour reductionism.

that

that's not even my post

That is just something he read on the wiki of the biological determinism

Which i btw mentiond on the other dicord.

Furter more the only counter argument of him against biological determinism which still stands was, plasticity. Which isnt a valid argument or even relative.

Yet you take the words he speaks as truth because you dislike me and have a bias agast the facts i drop 😄

@DA GOMMIE JOO I just heard a https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8kbsjkftKE comming from you

TBH I haven't been here that long but your recent messages remind me of the wojack meme.

Lol

```tl dr.
i am guessing its mostly asumtion, with a sprinkle of slander with out a actaul arguement
```

>types out a small wall in response anyway

***Hypocrisy much?***

```Guessing is better then assuming wrong, which is what happens a lot here```

No, it's on you to prove that you're right when your opponent is dead set upon showing over and over again that you're wrong. *There's a name for this: **the burden of proof**.*

Do not confuse this with having to research about whether someone else's claims are true or not.