I replied to him because he actaul made an efford. Why would i be butthurt ? Again you are implying and slandering

i mean i was just trying to derail this shit fest because it seems like its been going on for weeks

you are repeating his fallacy that some one using kratom is a ex opiate addict

Also yeah he just keeps getting roped back in. and keeps sayying more and more nonsensical stuff that is just snippits of wikipedia

I dont even know what he is trying to argue anymore as i debunked pretty much any point he brought up that actaully related to something i said

He keeps forgeting past points on which he was defeated and the next day he claims victory.

This trigger of his started because i mentiond the jews

tl;dr A Jewish person didn't like my art so I hate them all now

Better fail to take over Europe then kill myself

Majority of europeans hate europe

Jewish hatred is pretty common until the lolocaust

germany really just wanted to commit national suicide

so they elected a guy who took meth and slept all day

then declared war on everyone

and died

You're just simplifing it in a stupid way

They didn't know they would lose

Hitler didn't declared war on everyone

The allies were the one that declared war on hitler and refused hitler's white peace

I believed hitler only declared war on russia, poland, and the us

They elected a guy that spoke what the majority is thinking and someone that revived germany from a decadent nation to a powerhouse in just a few years

Hiltler was set up

germany was set up

and they got murdered

As for the poland war it was provoked

germany should not have fell for this

But borzo, it isnt about him being a painter, it isnt about hitler. It is about the description.
Why are you dodging changing the subject in this silly way ?

hitler was never elected

hindenburg appointed him

```"My argument was that you switched total biological determinism and biological reductionism" i never did this so your argument is wrong
```

But then your entire claim that we can never do anything about our biology dies. Also, you missed out half of that sentence: ***"My argument was that you switched total biological determinism and biological reductionism with a notion that there will always be some kind of biologically-determined substance which itself has an influence on human action."***

```its used for this, but ex junkies are also breathing air. by your logic you breathing air makes you a ex junkie
```

False comparison. Air and kratom are not equivalent substances. The latter is a drug, the former is not. Unless, of course, you mean nitrous oxide and not the atmosphere that we breathe in regularly.

***This is American argumentative prowess. Truly mindblowing.***

```garbage whole spile is implying something then tirade vaguly on that strawmen
most of the time the strawmen doesnt even holds up
It is funny
i call garbage a liar
what does he do```

@Garbage check <#308995540782284817> thanks

I saw it.

And I'll be using it too soon.

Nice

Anyway, @Deleted User, there was no straw man. You used this abstract proposition that we'd never totally stop every part of ourselves from being biologically determined (which was the point of you saying 'it's still the genes that are doing this' - it's just not THE SAME biology) - and you put it in place of complete biological determinism, which you must use to argue that the same differences will always exist between people and that class society will never go away.