t. 'fucking jew'

Also t. terminology-switcher.

```And then calling me a liar when you are the one doing all the lying stating that you didnt meant that to the spin that shit endlessly```

>implying

Who lied about what I said about kratom, about 'freedom', about the existence of biological trends and processes...?

***You said that I was talking about kratom-related deaths. You also said that I was harping on about how biology doesn't exist, when what I've said all this time is that it cannot provide a working model of human society as a whole due to subjectivity and reasoning - and your failure to account for this in all areas besides you having your own politics is a grave inconsistency.***

***You switched the specific notions of 'freedom' around to dismiss both a concrete, progressively-exploding kind through dismissing the abstract, as-is, god's-eye-view' kind. __And then you lied about the context in which I was calling you a liar.__***

You can keep screaming that I'm hiding behind the definist fallacy, but you're not actually tackling the concepts that I'm using which use those terms. And you haven't done that with both Marxist terminology and common academic terminology either.

You've been hiding behind this for a long time: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/81/Equivocation

In fact, I could open up a hailstorm of links which describe where your reasoning has failed miserably.

**I haven't even brought up some of the stuff that you completely missed, such as my criticism of IQ and *g* themselves.**

***It gets worse. I can resurrect the 'pam meme' thing: did you forget to put a '>' when you said 'they're the same thing' before you posted that image?***

🗿

***Why didn't you explain it to me earlier?***

Were you saying that anarchists and I both said that states and governments are the same? I served up commonly-used definitions and anarchist definitions. **You used your own to say that they were wrong following from your definitions without explaining why they were wrong besides screeching 'muh collective interests means unfreedom, why you gotta murder gods like that'.**

So not only did you try to throw me off by using assumptions which fit neither Marxist, nor common, nor Anarchist definitions, but you fucked up by using a meme which, given your previous confusions of various terms to fit your own personal assburger dictionary, could have had any context whatsoever as far as I could possibly give a shit.

**And then you failed to explain it to me, only to seize on it later so that you could pretend that you had an excuse using which you could say that you didn't backpedal.**

It doesn't matter. Both arguments were ruthlessly crushed: **neither of the sets of definitions that you gave me matched any of the three sorts that I brought up**, while I dismantled your definitions and showed that you were talking about things which are perhaps universally true for bourgeois politics as a whole (*hence the irony of you calling me a 'fascist' when, using your understanding of what a 'state' is, __everyone including you must also be a 'fascist'__*).

@Garbage You never pinged me and with this one image i show that you are the biggest ullshiter in the world

""hence the irony of you calling me a 'fascist' when, using your understanding of what a 'state' is"", lol i know what a polity is so i schooled you on it . As for the facist part, you have shown your facist ways, you argued that because you are in a state of transition with opposition it was okay

What is my understanding of a state, considering you pretend to be such and expert on my understandings surly you could awnser 😄

like i read 2 lines of your shit and already so many flaws and fails

You talked about stomping ppl with dissimular believes that did not match your own. And not just that you called for the entirety of communism to do this for you.

You have a dictator complex

are you short or something ?

I speak to honor him; he is both a sperger and a tistic
hear now the cry of our people; we speak for you

(I'm not trying to continue anything, I'm just playing. I like this meme)

"I speak to honor him; he is both a sperger and a tistic"
yeah i feel bad for disputing hims false statements, i dont want to make him feel bad or anything

but he keeps making up nonsense

```You never pinged me and with this one image i show that you are the biggest ullshiter in the world```

I never said anything about a sound being emitted.

The mention appears even when the sound doesn't come up.

***Game Over.***

```What is my understanding of a state, considering you pretend to be such and expert on my understandings surly you could awnser :smile:```

A centralised mode of political organisation which governments use.

You told me that the need for a state couldn't be done away with because there would always be a need for centralisation.

Secondly, you also told me that governments use states.

**Of course, you never actually said what you thought the term meant in this whole exchange, meaning that you set this whole thing up to retroactively define what you meant and pretend that you 'schooled' me. The above is therefore all that you've given me, so for all I care, it's the position that you've taken so far (assuming that you've taken just one position this whole time - which is pretty much me giving you the benefit of the doubt).**