*you're

Chopin you could still choose to hate your mother.

Love is a state of being. It does not need choice to arrive at.

Assuming choice is a real thing and not just a sensation.

What if the person you're marrying was the one who forced it would it be love in their eyes?

A state of being often is preceded by a choice leading up to that point

Except you're not forced to love God. The proof? The fact that you can reject him.

Often but not necessary.

Mros

In the cases where it isn't, it simply is

God not you

like natural phenemmenon

Love does not allow evil.

Love is doing what is best for someone

Actually it does

Well no

It's wanting the best for someone

it would be a non factor

Love encompasses a great many things

Letting someone chose evil is not best in terms of love.

But most of all, it is an unconditional affection towards another, irresepctive of their qualities

God loves us, not because we are good

We are born into sin

Chopin define what is evil?

He can't define evil

Evil is the rejection of god

Why would that be

Good and Evil cannot exist without God.

The absence of his prescene

God is good, wholly good

Then wouldn't god not everywhere

and would it be that god doesn't love he controlls

God is everywhere, but his essence isn't in everything. Christianity doesn't ascribe to a panentheistic view of reality

Like how a mad man likes to see a woman's mind breaking into stockholm

What is more loving? Pure love, or love and evil together? Choice allows evil. Choice is evil not loving.

What do you mean by those terms

Free will lets man chose evil. Without free will there would be no evil. That is more loving.

I think this is quite a complex topic, that many tomes have been written poring over this subject

Without free will there can be no good either

by both philoophers and theologians

https://discord.gg/3B5Qe