Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 321915299869884416
Also your looking at this wrong
*you're
Chopin you could still choose to hate your mother.
Love is a state of being. It does not need choice to arrive at.
Assuming choice is a real thing and not just a sensation.
What if the person you're marrying was the one who forced it would it be love in their eyes?
A state of being often is preceded by a choice leading up to that point
Except you're not forced to love God. The proof? The fact that you can reject him.
Often but not necessary.
Mros
In the cases where it isn't, it simply is
God not you
like natural phenemmenon
Love does not allow evil.
Love is doing what is best for someone
Actually it does
Well no
It's wanting the best for someone
it would be a non factor
Love encompasses a great many things
But most of all, it is an unconditional affection towards another, irresepctive of their qualities
God loves us, not because we are good
We are born into sin
Chopin define what is evil?
He can't define evil
Evil is the rejection of god
Why would that be
Good and Evil cannot exist without God.
The absence of his prescene
God is good, wholly good
Then wouldn't god not everywhere
and would it be that god doesn't love he controlls
God is everywhere, but his essence isn't in everything. Christianity doesn't ascribe to a panentheistic view of reality
Like how a mad man likes to see a woman's mind breaking into stockholm
What is more loving? Pure love, or love and evil together? Choice allows evil. Choice is evil not loving.
What do you mean by those terms
Free will lets man chose evil. Without free will there would be no evil. That is more loving.
I think this is quite a complex topic, that many tomes have been written poring over this subject
Without free will there can be no good either
by both philoophers and theologians