But it determines the interperation of it

because misinterperations are easy, especially in something like an English translation *especially* if it's KJV

But some people rely too heavily upon what their church or denomination has said to believe about some passages in scripture

I especially think you're correct

I'm not a fan of the KJV

Relying on the Church is completely normal

What's you vs a clergy? Clergy aren't infallible but are most likely more correct than an normal individual

The KJV was politcal through and through

You are correct to a point. You should be able to trust your church elders and deacons and wiser and more mature people in their faiths

But that doesn't mean you shouldnt explore the bible for yourself

The KJV was based on manuscript basis that is no longer as authorative

You should, but preferably ask clergy on interperation or get a Study Bible

And its translation of the words into Bishop as opposed to Overseer

Which is more literal

Yes, absolutely

Which translation do you use btw?

...NKJV. But I swears I only listen to commentary as according to my Study Bible

I still prefer ESV

Yeah

I use the ESV

Awesome translation

But I am still unanswered, how does the Reformed determine infallibility of an interperation of Scripture?

"The general rule of interpreting Scripture is this: the literal sense of every text is to be taken, if it be not contrary to some other texts: but in that case the obscure text is to be interpreted by those which speak more plainly. Wesley, Letters, 3:129; 5:328."

In some ways though, a literal translation is not prefereable, like for instance where poetical or allegorical language is used

But for the most part, most if not the vast majority of passages of scriputre are pretty obviously meant to be taken literally

this is just method, who declares it?

Because I'm a protestant I will be honest, its up to the church and their theolgical statements.

which church?

However, I think we can differ on secondary and tertiary matters

I thought you said you were reformed when I asked if you're protestant

However, when it comes to primary matters, such as the ressurection, the gospel and whatnot those are non-negotiable

I am protestant bro

The reformed camp is from the protestant tradition

>Because I'm a protestant I will be honest, its up to the church and their theolgical statements.
literally moral relativism

Well not exactly man

The Bible stands as the single authorative, infallible inerrant piece of scripture

Interepretion thereof is not divine

It's relativist if interperation cannot be infallible

The Bible as it stands, is the anchor and the foundation, along with the Holy Spirit man

Well, not really

I think that mis characterises quite of lot of Christianity man