Message from @Anglican
Discord ID: 322210397014982666
most commies aren't on that often anyway
Yeah
That's the funny part
/pol/ is an echo chamber.
Yeah
I hate /pol/
I posted there everyday for 6 months.
But I reformed.
I used to lurk a ton
Aquinas kept me awake last night.
I hope tonight will be different.
@Deleted User are you reading him after Greeks?
Aquinas?
Like the Particracy moderator?
Oh, no.
A philophor.
or...
I can't spell
Yes, Thomas Aquinas. Specifically the First Mover argument. Science does not contradict it. And I can't find any good refutations.
It is driving me crazy.
No.
what is true?
@Firefly I read Greek philosophy several years ago. I got into a discussion yesterday about God and was referred to Aquinas. He refutes a lot of the Greeks, so does most philosophers, and scientists.
That's a poor video.
But yes, that's the Argument.
The problem is that time and motion had a beginning.
I think there is no first move.
Its an eternal movement.
But science tells us there was a beginning in time and motion.
One of the theory made popular tells, yes.
There are different opinions and theories
Are you familiar with Soviet physicists, Lifshitz and Khalatnikov?
Turns out their theory was wrong.
So?
It is not about opinions.
Versions
Are different.
One popular idea inspired by Judaism and Christianity is not necessarily correct.
That's not what I am say. I am saying that science shows, especially in the last decade or so, that the universe had a beginning. And because of this, the First Mover argument is hard to refute.