Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 338438134406840322
Only because England countersignaled and Russia wouldn't freaking surrender
It's the most short lived because every other large nation hates it because it goes against free market and the Jewish influence.
Something that does not survive shall not live in first place, right?
nah
It's called competition.
HAIL VICTORY 👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽
The only way fascism can last in a nation is if the opposition is taken out
6@FuckNutJuice dude
shut thge fuck up retard
GAGAGAGYAYAYAUAUAUAUAAHAHAHAHAA
But it seems like that can't happen because it can never grow a foothold
We had a foothold. Shit just went awry. It was only 70 years ago, the cooldown period is ending
HAIL VICTORY 👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽
You want to restore your ideology for another 4 years?
Trump is sort of a pressure release valve.. he may only serve to extend the zog
Probably best if he gets impeached and the "leftists"get complete control
Why goims even come to this chat?
#Hitlerdidnothingwrong
fucking kikes stole yet another thing from us
anyone who is a communist is just a useful idiot
there is no inherent problem with jews
the talmud says otherwise
while not all jews believe in it, their religion holds enough of an influence for israel to be ruled in a theocratic sense
Rabbi's have more say than the politicans do
I've seen that chart before. It is debunked by both historians and records directly from the Soviet government as well as having an obscure journalist as the first citation and an irrelevant unused one as the second. @Deleted User
95% goes beyond any reason. Connecting thumbtacks with yarn-level paranoia.
>the soviet government is not corrupt
-sincerely, the soviet government
yeah right
and im not a nazi,
That fails to address the other two points?
That it has shitty unverified sources and that it has also been debunked by historians as a canard.
what 'two other points' are you referring to
I've seen that chart before. It is debunked by both historians and records directly from the Soviet government as well as having an obscure journalist as the first citation and an irrelevant unused one as the second.
>the soviet government is not corrupt
-sincerely, the soviet government
1) The Soviet government disagrees.
2) Credible historians disagree.
3) The citations are shit.
That's 1 for 3. Congratulations.
Im sorry, but someone saying that something is not true does not make it fact