it is tho

The words "Anarcho-capitalists" and "Anarcho-communists" sounds contradictory.

they are @Dark Chocolate Muffin

well, anarcho capitalist is

anarcho-communism is an oxymoron

they both mean the same thing

from the perspective of anarchism, the state and capitalism are intertwined and cannot exist without each other

so anarcho capitalism makes zero sense

capitalism can exist without state

well

not really

you see, albeit anarcho-capitalism states money without government, money will kind of be the de facto state of the nation

let's see

you have one company with the most wealth

and one company with the least

who are those people gonna look up to the most?

exactly

Probably the individual. xD

also, anarcho-capitalism allows for companies to monopoly

or monopsony

yeah

so therefore, the nation will eventually claim that company the de facto government/leader

Doesn't the government regulate for monopolies? xD

we can look through history, and see "anarcho capitalism" in action during the Gilded Age

with very little government intervention

well, don't get your knots too much in a twist

I don't believe anarchism has every been done before.

anarchy, anarcho-communism, nor communism will work as well

you cant trust people to look after the welfare of the nation when there are no legal repercussions for their actions

Catalonia and Hungary did it pretty well for a time

before being crushed

theyll most likely benefit for themselves

well, it was more anarcho syndicalism

all these societies who've tried this before crumbled due to power struggles

I agree

I'm more statist than anarchist

me too

im a state syndicalist

I don't really agree with anarchism, but I get their perspective

i dont

Do you believe that soviet russia an example of a communist state? :3