Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 410613498360365056
so anarcho capitalism makes zero sense
capitalism can exist without state
well
not really
you see, albeit anarcho-capitalism states money without government, money will kind of be the de facto state of the nation
let's see
you have one company with the most wealth
and one company with the least
who are those people gonna look up to the most?
exactly
Probably the individual. xD
also, anarcho-capitalism allows for companies to monopoly
or monopsony
yeah
so therefore, the nation will eventually claim that company the de facto government/leader
Doesn't the government regulate for monopolies? xD
we can look through history, and see "anarcho capitalism" in action during the Gilded Age
with very little government intervention
well, don't get your knots too much in a twist
I don't believe anarchism has every been done before.
you cant trust people to look after the welfare of the nation when there are no legal repercussions for their actions
Catalonia and Hungary did it pretty well for a time
before being crushed
theyll most likely benefit for themselves
well, it was more anarcho syndicalism
all these societies who've tried this before crumbled due to power struggles
I agree
I'm more statist than anarchist
me too
im a state syndicalist
I don't really agree with anarchism, but I get their perspective
i dont
Do you believe that soviet russia an example of a communist state? :3
hell no
soviet russia was fascist
it was neither communist nor socialist
it was fascist
it was authoritarian socialism
not necessarily fascist
no, it was fascist