@twook Shush, like I said before, let the man do the arguing for himself.

@Deleted User I agree.

Prove me wrong commies

okay

let;s do it

I'm not sure if I could even be called a commie anymore

20 million people have died because of communism

i lean more towards titoism now i guess

@twook >Collapses the same way as the austro-hungarian empire
Oh boy, you really are lost.

Hello friends what is this server

Ever heard of the "great leap forward"
A little project started by Mao

Is this for smart people

that wasnt really a problem with the policies he had enacted if you ask me

everything only started going to shit after he died and it turned into a nationalist free for all

why is killingpeople bad?

.......

@twook I didn't know that your entire country collapsing after all of the states within it declare independance wasn't a bad thing.

tito died before that happened and im not in this to discuss nationalism

i just believe he had good policies that aided the working class

@twook Well, he failed to stop the nationalism that tore his country apart and led to it collapsing, which is an administraitve and executive failure.

I suppose but I wouldn't blame him exactly, it was kinda inevitable I suppose unless someone very similar to him had succeeded him

but instead it was nationalists who in turn spurred opposing nationalism

@twook >Nationalists opposed nationalists
What?

that happens all the time

when you have two different nations

You can blame tito exactly because he failed to stop his country from collapsing, and the issues plauging it at the time.

that was basically like the entire 18th 19th and 20th centruy

nations fighting it out

nations of nationalists

@Deleted User why do you think yugoslavia broke apart

it was nationalism vs nationalism

and maybe he could have done more to try and quell it but eh

@Arch_NME No it wasn't, during the 18th century, what we know as nationalism now didn't even exist, this applies as well to the 19th century as well, up until extremely late in that century, and it wasn't the cause for WW1, or WW2 either.

i dont really care to speculate i just like his economic policies

@twook No it wasn't, it was because those countries wanted to separate from yugoslavia and to manage their own people under their own rules outside of a soviet occupied state, it had nothing to do with nations fighting each other.

so

who do you think was fighting and for what reason

it was literally nationalists fighting nationalists

@twook For the most part wasn't the independance declarations bloodless? Last I heard of bloodshed in the balkans, was far after yugoslavia collapsed.

Of course, when a country that has existed since the 50's collapses in a way similar to the soviet union, that will leave the region exceptionally unstable.

(As what happened in the northern middle east, and eastern europe after the soviet union collapsed.)