Idc about what order you think comes from the state and therefore isnt there because mugabes coup

entirely random

my point is we take a shit load of money from the third world

and when we give back a fraction people like you complain

Absolutely nowhere, with africa being 100X worse than it was in the 70's.

and sure, if you dont want to give it back, dont

then dont complain

But again, countries in latin america

were doing better during the 70s

so yes

alot of the third world

is doing worse after the 70s

why?

cause of this neoliberal policy tying in the IMF and world bank

thats intrinsically what im saying is the issue

that the 70s moving into the early 2000s

as far as economics go, made these places objectively worse

as a result of them essentially becoming client states

for countries like the UK and US

@Comrade Skeltal Not really, I say it is because the colonial governments moved out, and the niggers over there really have no way of coping with it, and as a result drive their entire continent in the ground.

'niggers' oooh wee you're one of those internet racists

good stuff

it isnt that the state is a failure on the continent due to the environment

it isnt that they werent allowed to develop their own systems

its that they're "niggers"

ok

Just let me know when you're done, Imma go do literally anything else.

If the jungle kept them from developing, then please, explain to me how the aztec, mayan, and inca civilizations were able to develop and establish fairly civilized and technoligically advanced empires, when the blacks weren't? And, if they still weren't able to because of the environment, then why was colonial south africa, rhodesia, as well as the congo, algeria, and eygypt so successful, and became so advanced and developed in the span of under 100 years, during which, the blacks were unable to anything in there for THOUSANDS of years.

If I am correct, the inca's actually had primitive GUNS, before they were conquered, and this was after thousands of years of isolation, and living in a jungle.

So why weren't the niggers capable of doing anything in all that time, with so many resources, and so much land?

Do you seriously believe that all of subsaharan Africa is jungle, nigger? After you manage to get past the Saharan Desert (this) https://img.purch.com/w/640/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAzMC85NzIvaTAyL3NodXR0ZXJzdG9ja185MzQwNDI4Ny5qcGc/MTM0NzQ4MzcxOQ==

You mostly get this https://image.slidesharecdn.com/africanpoliticalandphysicalmap-160118190814/95/african-political-and-physical-map-5-638.jpg?cb=1453144117

https://www.sciencedaily.com/images/2015/10/151019130802_1_540x360.jpg

But no, lets pretend that all of Africa is a jungle and therefore "if mayans can do it, so can you!!!!1111"

hi im american

Africa is a dope place

@Comrade Skeltal Oh no area's like cape are actually temperate, and have forests as well as natural coastlines and rivers.

@Comrade Skeltal And, if those in central america, or those in south america could build their own civilizations, some of which being COMPLETELY LANDLOCKED, why coulden't the blacks, who had much more resources, coasts, much more land, and a lot more people?

They did... They built civilizations relevant to their given circumstances. There were infact jungle kingdoms, kingdoms everywhere, only, they didnt function in the same way as European society due to the environmental contexts being different. Why are you being slow?

The very existence of food and water is something seasonal in many places on the continent, it isnt inherently conducive to static societies in every location

There is a reason why places located along the Nile had such great progress