Message from @alines
Discord ID: 421765066036346880
How could anarchists be disarmed by the republicans, if this was after the war ended in favor of the nationalists?
you seem to think that's the way it had to have happened, since falange apparently has full culpability according to you
@alines That's the way you put it, you quite literally are arguing with yourself now.
no, i said FIRST anarchists were disarmed by republicans, THEN crushed by falange.
try actually reading
@alines But you questioned yourself on how the anarchists could have been disarmed by the republicans.
what is rhetoric?
"how could anarchists be disarmed by republicans after being crushed by nationalists?"
what are rhetorical questions?
@alines The only rhetoric I see here is fallacy.
go on and tell me what fallacy
not a word
I would say a hastily generalization, mostly due to the fact that you questioned how the anarchists could have been disarmed after the civil war, which didn't happen, and you bring together another fallacy, by just stating "OH IT WAS ALL A RHETORIC ALL ALONG!" which I seriously doubt is the truth, unless english isn't your first language, you are autistic, or just have issues with reading and text, along with that, you seem to be so stubborn, that you will outright refuse to admit that you made a mistake, in favor of continuing to argue with me.
falange wasn't the only force responsible for the defeat of the anarchists.
that's where you seem to have it wrong.
and i can admit to mistakes and still argue with you
Then prove it!
"I can admit mistakes, but I won't for you!"
How hypocritical.
You truly will say anything to make yourself seem better, won't you?
okay, i shouldn't have assumed you had the order of events leading to anarchist defeat switched
Was that what you call an apology?
You must have issues pal.
falange did not defeat the anarchists simply by overwhelming them.
the anarchist disarmed by republican forces before falange got to them
Ah, avoiding now I see.
this has been my argument the entire time
@alines So instead of acknowledging your faults and responding to them, you simply ignore them and move onto something else? How pathetic you truly are.
repeating myself is moving on to something else.
yes calling people pathetic is always proof of your own validity. what's really pathetic is starting with saying i argue with myself, then saying i'm avoiding the topic i keep making the exact same comments on.
that's pathetic
Oh I am not doing this for myself, but I am calling you out on your short comings which you are extremely stubborn on and refuse to acknowledge, and then I called you out again for attempting to ignore them.
you'll just grab on to any fallacy you can think of instead of saying, "no the anarchists still had weapons, falange just overwhelmed them."
say it
make it clear, what are those shortcomings?
What? That is what I have been trying to say for the longest time, but yet you have gone on your nonsensical rants and what not, derailing this whole conversation.
One of your biggest shortcomings are your stubborness you will argue for the sake of arguing, and will refuse to ever admit that you are in the wrong. The second is your wording and text, seeing as how you can't make hardly any argument that holds up over time, and you constantly have to change, restate, and give up all together, just because you cannot string a proper sentence and statement together, without seeming like a person who cannot make up his mind to save his life.
i've been saying over and over that the republican government betrayed the revolution in barcelona and catalonia.
they did.
many times.
but i guess now they didn't because you said so.
insult after insult, and projection.
that is the crux of your thinking
and being betrayed by the republican government didn't lead to the defeat of the anarchists, is that what you're gonna say next?
@alines Did I ever claim that they didn't?
Projection? Insulting? Hah.
'pathetic' 'stubborn'
not insults, i suppose
They are harsh critisisms of what you really are.
how is 'pathetic' a criticism and not just plainly an insult?
@Queef Madagascar as for you,
anarchists made many attempts to educate the workers, many were successful, and published the philosophy that made the second republic of spain possible.
they increased literacy, made honest attempts at training workers for fighting, established worker's syndicates, collectivized labor and industry, and helped to bring down the monarchy and established democratic territories for themselves.
yup, we're just ALL empty promises
fuck you
anarchist and communist should always support each other
we might have different POVs
but like we all want the same