Message from @Zircuits

Discord ID: 430855500876349440


2018-04-03 22:10:51 UTC  

You can't have capitalism without it. I'd be skeptical if a socialist came into power and privatized the roads, for example

2018-04-03 22:12:16 UTC  

@Zircuits You can have private property without capitalism, nazi germany is a good example.

If you need an example of privatization in socialist countries, just take a look at the later soviet union and occupied europe, and south amerika.

2018-04-03 22:13:54 UTC  

During the rise of economical reformism

2018-04-03 22:14:18 UTC  

Lenin actually allowed private property.

2018-04-03 22:15:14 UTC  

During the reforms on the economy because of the civil war

2018-04-03 22:15:30 UTC  

Nope, he allowed it after the civil war.

2018-04-03 22:17:26 UTC  

Stalin was the one who revoked it, and then it ironically came back very soon after his death.

2018-04-03 22:17:45 UTC  

During another rise of economical reformism

2018-04-03 22:18:23 UTC  

@Zircuits Lenin wasn't the reformer, he was the founder.

2018-04-03 22:19:00 UTC  

He allowed privatization under communism, and stalin was the only one who actually ended it.... temporarily.

2018-04-03 22:19:20 UTC  

One of many criticisms of Lenin is his reforms on the economy, but some socialists defended it because of the civil war

2018-04-03 22:19:41 UTC  

@Zircuits What did I say earlier?

2018-04-03 22:19:51 UTC  

He allowed it to stay after the war.

2018-04-03 22:20:08 UTC  

It only ended under stalin.

2018-04-03 22:20:22 UTC  

So it was ended, just not under lenin

2018-04-03 22:20:55 UTC  

Then it came back.

2018-04-03 22:21:25 UTC  

Hell, collectivization lasted shorter than capitalization by almost 100 years.

2018-04-03 22:22:41 UTC  

It led to the fall of the USSR and a rise in poverty

2018-04-03 22:23:38 UTC  

Poverty and starvation was it's worse under stalin actually.

2018-04-03 22:23:59 UTC  

But to be fair, that can be attributed to WW2...... for the most part.

2018-04-03 22:25:56 UTC  

Starvation can also be explained by the massive industrialization effort

2018-04-03 22:27:25 UTC  

Isn't that a reckless maneouver though? Europe managed to do it just fine without the mass starvation.....

2018-04-03 22:28:13 UTC  

Russia was a very backwards country at this time

2018-04-03 22:28:43 UTC  

It had famines all the time also, even before communism, as a result

2018-04-03 22:28:44 UTC  

Hell, it should have been much easier to do at that time, since technology had advanced by 40 years.

2018-04-03 22:28:56 UTC  

@ᵈˢʳ✪ But none so severe.

2018-04-03 22:32:59 UTC  

@ᵈˢʳ✪ True, but it only became worse under communism.

2018-04-03 22:33:21 UTC  

The soviet tried to solve it, but while undergoing a rapid industrialisation process

2018-04-03 22:33:31 UTC  

Of course they would have worsened

2018-04-03 22:33:39 UTC  

@ᵈˢʳ✪ And look at how it turned out.

2018-04-03 22:33:53 UTC  

Look at the Great Leap Forward in the PRC

2018-04-03 22:34:11 UTC  

@ᵈˢʳ✪ >Of course they would have worsened

2018-04-03 22:34:22 UTC  

are you sure it worsened?

2018-04-03 22:34:30 UTC  

After a civil war and a push for industrialization which led them to become one of the most powerful countries

2018-04-03 22:35:31 UTC  

@Zircuits Not really, they were inferior in everyway to the west, their only advantage was numbers and territory.

2018-04-03 22:35:45 UTC  

I think ww2 had a greater effect, though @Deleted User

2018-04-03 22:35:58 UTC  

I think we’re forgetting who did most of the fighting

2018-04-03 22:36:13 UTC  

Germany.

2018-04-03 22:36:18 UTC  

Kek

2018-04-03 22:36:24 UTC  

also the space race and the nuclear arms race