they made profits though

As long as you have commodity production and markets, in which costumers pay money to buy things, it is capitalism. If products are sold on the market they can’t be simultaneously be free welfare.

@DA GOMMIE JOO And how does that matter?

companies will support anything if it nets them more profit

THINK for a second

@Deleted User Nope, you said yourself that it is when businesses are owned privately for profit.

Which they WERE

commodity production is by definition production for profit

@DA GOMMIE JOO And in the case of germany, they put the state first and profit second, which made them profit in the process.

@Deleted User Nope.

nice argument

"*complex theory*"
"nope"

@Deleted User Tell me how they were owned only for profit then.

Because they were sold on markets

guys

with wage labor

i am oficially

blue pilled

on the JQ

help me

but are you redpilled on the AQ?

@Deleted User What?

i dont like isreal

the two prerequisites for profit

the JQ is shit
consider the AQ

but jews dont control banks

or politics

anglos do though

You’re lucky this discussion has diverged

Do an economics course in the meantime

plenty of videos on Youtube

@Deleted User What? According to the webster dictionary.... profit comes when earnings are greater than that of expendenture....

How the hell did you relate that to wage labor?

when you talk about profit but don't understand how it's made

@DA GOMMIE JOO Just told you how profit is madw.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/profit

@Deleted User Earnings are made through selling things on markets.
If you are selling things on a market, you have to make profit, which is done by the extraction of surplus value from labor. (wage labor system)

@Deleted User Not inherently so, but I see your point....

Go on.....

If you don’t know what the basic economic analysis of value is and don’t know what the labor theory of value is, don’t be making judgements on what Marxism is BTW

Do not diverge from what we are talking about.