Message from @The Enigma Report
Discord ID: 590148977538891806
LOL
"man these pictures dont prove anything"
In the end all that matters was that the vile fascists roaches were destroyed
They actually don't
Because they aren't quantified
the soviet union totally won ww2 on their own guys
they totally didnt rely heavily on outside help
They did
For the most part
You should look up how many T-34s the Soviets produced
literally just showed you otherwise
Because I'm sure it would be a lot more than 5000
tankies like to ignore every other allied country and outside help to push the narrative that the soviets were the ones who won
@laurentia it's funny watching you discuss the conditions under which your fascist Nazis were wiped out
@Danny Sullivan its funny how you keep pushing false narratives to make the ussr seem holier than thou
@Łukasz you're insane
you can tell when danny has no argument when he just starts insulting people
i'm here muslim
Oh hello
lmao
```Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics does not regard nature as an accidental agglomeration of things, of phenomena, unconnected with, isolated from, and independent of, each other, but as a connected and integral whole, in which things, phenomena are organically connected with, dependent on, and determined by, each other.
The dialectical method therefore holds that no phenomenon in nature can be understood if taken by itself, isolated from surrounding phenomena, inasmuch as any phenomenon in any realm of nature may become meaningless to us if it is not considered in connection with the surrounding conditions, but divorced from them; and that, vice versa, any phenomenon can be understood and explained if considered in its inseparable connection with surrounding phenomena, as one conditioned by surrounding phenomena.
```
```Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics holds that nature is not a state of rest and immobility, stagnation and immutability, but a state of continuous movement and change, of continuous renewal and development, where something is always arising and developing, and something always disintegrating and dying away.
The dialectical method therefore requires that phenomena should be considered not only from the standpoint of their interconnection and interdependence, but also from the standpoint of their movement, their change, their development, their coming into being and going out of being.
The dialectical method regards as important primarily not that which at the given moment seems to be durable and yet is already beginning to die away, but that which is arising and developing, even though at the given moment it may appear to be not durable, for the dialectical method considers invincible only that which is arising and developing.```
```dialectics holds that internal contradictions are inherent in all things and phenomena of nature, for they all have their negative and positive sides, a past and a future, something dying away and something developing; and that the struggle between these opposites, the struggle between the old and the new, between that which is dying away and that which is being born, between that which is disappearing and that which is developing, constitutes the internal content of the process of development, the internal content of the transformation of quantitative changes into qualitative changes.
```
```Contrary to idealism, which regards the world as the embodiment of an "absolute idea," a "universal spirit," "consciousness," Marx's philosophical materialism holds that the world is by its very nature material, that the multifold phenomena of the world constitute different forms of matter in motion, that interconnection and interdependence of phenomena as established by the dialectical method, are a law of the development of moving matter, and that the world develops in accordance with the laws of movement of matter and stands in no need of a "universal spirit."```
It would seem that dialectic thought would imply that the state will continue to grow as has been historically shown, rather than the stateless utopia that Marx envisioned
How does dialectics deal with the principle of explosion?
I have never heard of such a principle
Interesting, now I want a formal logic proof of this principle
Also, why are you in politics and not <#578400563902021653>
@Useful Bard Do you still want it?
yeah
**Principle of Explosion:** "You can prove anything from a contradiction"
```
{1} N ^ ~N (premise)
{2} N (law of conjunction something I forget)
{3} X (premise)
{4} N v X (law of disjunctive addition)
{5} ~N (law of conjunction something I forget)
therefore
{6} X
```
Hello all